PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTIBX vs. SBHVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTIBX vs. SBHVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTIBX achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than SBHVX's 18.96% return. Over the past 10 years, WTIBX has underperformed SBHVX with an annualized return of 2.25%, while SBHVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.39% annualized return.


WTIBX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.45%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
0.75%
10Y*
2.25%

SBHVX

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.35%
YTD
18.96%
6M
21.41%
1Y
45.27%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
10.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTIBX vs. SBHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTIBX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund
0.42%7.38%1.99%7.47%-13.13%-0.58%8.49%8.80%-0.17%4.74%
SBHVX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund
18.96%12.27%12.31%11.97%-14.66%16.61%6.22%24.65%-4.54%10.92%

Correlation

The correlation between WTIBX and SBHVX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

-0.06

The correlation between WTIBX and SBHVX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTIBX vs. SBHVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIBX
WTIBX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
WTIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

SBHVX
SBHVX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SBHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SBHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTIBX vs. SBHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTIBXSBHVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

2.23

-0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.15

3.17

-1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.38

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

3.58

-1.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.03

12.17

-6.14

WTIBX vs. SBHVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTIBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the SBHVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTIBX and SBHVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTIBXSBHVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.23

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.34

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.49

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.44

+0.59

Drawdowns

WTIBX vs. SBHVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIBX drawdown since its inception was -17.72%, smaller than the maximum SBHVX drawdown of -41.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIBX and SBHVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTIBXSBHVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.72%

-41.54%

+23.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-12.18%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.83%

-29.43%

+23.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.72%

-29.43%

+11.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.72%

-41.54%

+23.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-0.89%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.95%

-7.27%

+5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

3.58%

-2.62%

Volatility

WTIBX vs. SBHVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX) is 1.39%, while Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund (SBHVX) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that WTIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTIBXSBHVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

5.32%

-3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

13.65%

-10.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.86%

20.15%

-16.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.64%

21.24%

-15.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.67%

21.29%

-16.62%

WTIBX vs. SBHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTIBX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than SBHVX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTIBX vs. SBHVX - Dividend Comparison

WTIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than SBHVX's 9.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBHVX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Value Fund
9.79%11.65%4.61%1.37%1.25%4.66%0.95%6.05%10.28%6.78%0.22%5.76%
WTIBX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund
4.14%4.11%4.04%3.66%3.23%3.08%3.95%3.95%3.55%3.50%3.43%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTIBX and SBHVX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBHVX has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to WTIBX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTIBX dropped -17.72% vs SBHVX's -41.54%.

SBHVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTIBX and SBHVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer