PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTAIX vs. TFCYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTAIX vs. TFCYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund (WTAIX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Free Conservative Income Fund (TFCYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTAIX achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than TFCYX's 0.92% return.


WTAIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.11%
1Y
5.62%
3Y*
3.26%
5Y*
0.65%
10Y*
1.55%

TFCYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.92%
6M
1.15%
1Y
2.45%
3Y*
2.86%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTAIX vs. TFCYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTAIX
Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund
0.72%5.05%0.73%5.14%-8.01%0.55%2.60%7.12%0.86%4.30%
TFCYX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Free Conservative Income Fund
0.92%2.71%3.24%2.77%0.72%0.10%0.46%1.40%1.25%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between WTAIX and TFCYX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.21

The correlation between WTAIX and TFCYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (5 years) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTAIX vs. TFCYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTAIX
WTAIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WTAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
WTAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TFCYX
TFCYX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TFCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TFCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTAIX vs. TFCYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund (WTAIX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Free Conservative Income Fund (TFCYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTAIXTFCYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.65

3.28

-0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.06

10.90

-6.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

5.87

-4.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

26.92

-24.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.57

82.26

-75.68

WTAIX vs. TFCYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTAIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the TFCYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTAIX and TFCYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTAIXTFCYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

3.28

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

1.70

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

1.66

-0.51

Drawdowns

WTAIX vs. TFCYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTAIX drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, which is greater than TFCYX's maximum drawdown of -1.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTAIX and TFCYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTAIXTFCYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.35%

-1.10%

-11.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-0.10%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.87%

-1.10%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.35%

-1.10%

-11.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

0.00%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-0.02%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.03%

+0.85%

Volatility

WTAIX vs. TFCYX - Volatility Comparison

Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund (WTAIX) has a higher volatility of 0.82% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Free Conservative Income Fund (TFCYX) at 0.19%. This indicates that WTAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFCYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTAIXTFCYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

0.19%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.66%

0.57%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10%

0.75%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.08%

1.22%

+1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.44%

0.91%

+2.53%

WTAIX vs. TFCYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTAIX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than TFCYX's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTAIX vs. TFCYX - Dividend Comparison

WTAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than TFCYX's 2.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TFCYX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Free Conservative Income Fund
2.42%2.68%3.19%2.63%0.72%0.00%0.46%1.39%1.24%0.68%0.00%0.00%
WTAIX
Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund
2.69%2.85%2.11%2.03%1.45%1.68%1.72%3.84%2.15%2.92%2.63%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTAIX and TFCYX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTAIX has higher volatility (0.82%) compared to TFCYX (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTAIX dropped -12.35% vs TFCYX's -1.10%.

TFCYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTAIX and TFCYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer