WTAI vs. QGRW

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

WTAI (WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund) and QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WTAI is a Technology Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence & Innovation Index, while QGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTAI returned 37.80%/yr vs 26.28%/yr for QGRW. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WTAI charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QGRW.

Performance

WTAI vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund (WTAI) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTAI achieves a 59.44% return, which is significantly higher than QGRW's 9.00% return.

WTAI

• 1D: 4.08%
• 1M: 7.05%
• YTD: 59.44%
• 6M: 58.38%
• 1Y: 96.65%
• 3Y*: 37.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QGRW

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -3.66%
• YTD: 9.00%
• 6M: 7.55%
• 1Y: 24.69%
• 3Y*: 26.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTAI vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WTAI WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund	59.44%	34.83%	6.53%	46.32%	-8.11%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	9.00%	19.20%	34.85%	56.05%	-3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between WTAI and QGRW is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2022	0.87

The correlation between WTAI and QGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

WTAI vs. QGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WTAI	QGRW
Technology	71.6%	55.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	11.6%
Communication Services	7.2%	16.4%
Industrials	5.6%	7.6%
Financial Services	3.8%	3.7%
Utilities	0.9%	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	0.4%	0.5%
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	4.4%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

WTAI vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTAI

WTAI Risk / Return Rank: 90
WTAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
WTAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
WTAI Omega Ratio Rank: 87
WTAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
WTAI Martin Ratio Rank: 92

QGRW

QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 40
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 41
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTAI vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund (WTAI) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WTAI	QGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.97	1.33	+1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	1.84	+1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.24	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.30	1.61	+4.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.06	5.97	+13.09

WTAI vs. QGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTAI Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is higher than the QGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTAI and QGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WTAI vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTAI drawdown since its inception was -45.96%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTAI and QGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTAI	QGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.96%	-24.40%	-21.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.42%	-15.44%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.83%	-24.40%	-7.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.91%	-6.82%	+2.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.66%	-3.29%	-16.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.09%	4.14%	+0.95%

Volatility

WTAI vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund (WTAI) has a higher volatility of 18.21% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) at 7.92%. This indicates that WTAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTAI	QGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.21%	7.92%	+10.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.86%	15.10%	+12.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.74%	18.64%	+14.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.79%	21.27%	+10.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.79%	21.27%	+10.52%

WTAI vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTAI has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTAI vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

WTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than QGRW's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	0.08%	0.09%	0.14%	0.11%	0.00%
WTAI WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund	1.13%	1.81%	0.19%	0.24%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTAI and QGRW in my portfolio?

WTAI and QGRW have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WTAI or QGRW?

WTAI has higher volatility (18.21%) compared to QGRW (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTAI dropped -45.96% vs QGRW's -24.40%.

Which ETF is better, WTAI or QGRW?

On 3-year performance, WTAI leads with 37.80% vs 26.28% for QGRW. On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, QGRW has been the lower-risk option at 7.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WTAI or QGRW?

Over the 3-year period, WTAI has performed better with a 37.80% return vs 26.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTAI or QGRW?

QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WTAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTAI or QGRW?

WTAI has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.08% for QGRW.

What is the main difference between WTAI and QGRW?

WTAI is categorized as Technology Equities, while QGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. WTAI tracks WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence & Innovation Index, while QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WTAI and 0.28% for QGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WTAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.