PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSTAX vs. PRGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WSTAX vs. PRGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A (WSTAX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSTAX achieves a 41.80% return, which is significantly lower than PRGTX's 44.18% return. Over the past 10 years, WSTAX has outperformed PRGTX with an annualized return of 24.74%, while PRGTX has yielded a comparatively lower 19.61% annualized return.


WSTAX

1D
1.03%
1M
15.75%
YTD
41.80%
6M
42.57%
1Y
76.95%
3Y*
52.21%
5Y*
25.51%
10Y*
24.74%

PRGTX

1D
1.35%
1M
20.72%
YTD
44.18%
6M
43.53%
1Y
79.97%
3Y*
40.07%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
19.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WSTAX vs. PRGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WSTAX
Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A
41.80%33.91%59.64%40.44%-32.50%14.19%36.12%50.35%-5.23%32.77%
PRGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund
44.18%27.28%33.12%55.92%-55.53%8.85%75.77%34.22%-10.07%47.09%

Correlation

The correlation between WSTAX and PRGTX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.87

The correlation between WSTAX and PRGTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSTAX vs. PRGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSTAX
WSTAX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
WSTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
WSTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

PRGTX
PRGTX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PRGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WSTAX vs. PRGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A (WSTAX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WSTAXPRGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.58

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.75

6.32

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.39

19.93

-2.54

WSTAX vs. PRGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSTAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.34, which is comparable to the PRGTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSTAX and PRGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WSTAXPRGTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34

3.57

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.39

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.69

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.47

+0.06

Drawdowns

WSTAX vs. PRGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSTAX drawdown since its inception was -55.39%, smaller than the maximum PRGTX drawdown of -71.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSTAX and PRGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSTAXPRGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.39%

-71.18%

+15.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.73%

-13.06%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.35%

-26.67%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.39%

-65.29%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.39%

-65.29%

+9.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-21.54%

+6.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.56%

4.13%

+0.43%

Volatility

WSTAX vs. PRGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A (WSTAX) is 7.17%, while T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that WSTAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSTAXPRGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.17%

8.26%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.78%

18.69%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.79%

23.11%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.95%

31.80%

+5.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.71%

28.39%

+2.32%

WSTAX vs. PRGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WSTAX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than PRGTX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

WSTAX vs. PRGTX - Dividend Comparison

WSTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.92%, while PRGTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.28%27.71%5.05%0.15%24.67%15.81%9.46%10.03%
WSTAX
Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A
12.92%18.32%36.08%11.62%33.72%42.99%8.89%11.48%13.99%6.95%0.00%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, WSTAX and PRGTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRGTX has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to WSTAX (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSTAX dropped -55.39% vs PRGTX's -71.18%.

PRGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 3.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSTAX and PRGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer