PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSTAX vs. FGIPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WSTAX vs. FGIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A (WSTAX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSTAX achieves a 45.86% return, which is significantly higher than FGIPX's 18.47% return. Over the past 10 years, WSTAX has outperformed FGIPX with an annualized return of 25.44%, while FGIPX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.23% annualized return.


WSTAX

1D
3.25%
1M
11.72%
YTD
45.86%
6M
45.11%
1Y
79.59%
3Y*
52.20%
5Y*
25.77%
10Y*
25.44%

FGIPX

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.80%
YTD
18.47%
6M
17.70%
1Y
43.42%
3Y*
25.71%
5Y*
17.59%
10Y*
13.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WSTAX vs. FGIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WSTAX
Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A
45.86%33.91%59.64%40.44%-32.50%14.19%36.12%50.35%-5.23%32.77%
FGIPX
Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class
18.47%30.18%15.44%12.17%3.28%21.73%-4.59%25.96%-9.95%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between WSTAX and FGIPX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2013

0.69

The correlation between WSTAX and FGIPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSTAX vs. FGIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSTAX
WSTAX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
WSTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
WSTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FGIPX
FGIPX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FGIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FGIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WSTAX vs. FGIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A (WSTAX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WSTAXFGIPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.67

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.73

6.08

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.84

23.11

-6.27

WSTAX vs. FGIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSTAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is comparable to the FGIPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSTAX and FGIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WSTAX vs. FGIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSTAX drawdown since its inception was -55.39%, which is greater than FGIPX's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSTAX and FGIPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSTAXFGIPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.39%

-37.32%

-18.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.73%

-7.26%

-9.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.35%

-13.27%

-14.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.39%

-16.19%

-39.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.39%

-37.32%

-18.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.34%

+1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.92%

-4.16%

-10.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.69%

1.90%

+2.79%

Volatility

WSTAX vs. FGIPX - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A (WSTAX) has a higher volatility of 12.47% compared to Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX) at 4.14%. This indicates that WSTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSTAXFGIPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.47%

4.14%

+8.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.69%

8.80%

+12.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.21%

11.81%

+14.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.28%

14.93%

+22.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.90%

17.14%

+13.76%

WSTAX vs. FGIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WSTAX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIPX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

WSTAX vs. FGIPX - Dividend Comparison

WSTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.56%, more than FGIPX's 9.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGIPX
Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class
9.60%11.68%12.69%7.50%7.35%12.20%2.13%52.72%25.63%5.58%4.22%5.88%
WSTAX
Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A
12.56%18.32%36.08%11.62%33.72%42.99%8.89%11.48%13.99%6.95%0.00%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


WSTAX and FGIPX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WSTAX has higher volatility (12.47%) compared to FGIPX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSTAX dropped -55.39% vs FGIPX's -37.32%.

FGIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 3.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSTAX and FGIPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer