PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSTAX vs. FAGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WSTAX vs. FAGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A (WSTAX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSTAX achieves a 31.65% return, which is significantly higher than FAGAX's 7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, WSTAX has outperformed FAGAX with an annualized return of 23.25%, while FAGAX has yielded a comparatively lower 20.72% annualized return.


WSTAX

1D
5.34%
1M
-3.36%
6M
22.27%
YTD
31.65%
1Y
49.56%
3Y*
44.90%
5Y*
21.87%
10Y*
23.25%
ALL TIME*
12.44%

FAGAX

1D
3.39%
1M
-5.33%
6M
8.39%
YTD
7.33%
1Y
17.88%
3Y*
23.97%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*
20.72%
ALL TIME*
10.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

WSTAX vs. FAGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WSTAX
Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A
31.65%33.91%59.64%40.44%-32.50%14.19%36.12%50.35%-5.23%32.77%
FAGAX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A
7.33%22.17%38.71%45.14%-38.40%11.31%68.60%40.26%14.87%34.66%

Correlation

The correlation between WSTAX and FAGAX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2000

0.90

The correlation between WSTAX and FAGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSTAX vs. FAGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WSTAX
WSTAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
WSTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WSTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FAGAX
FAGAX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FAGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FAGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WSTAX vs. FAGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A (WSTAX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WSTAXFAGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.14

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

1.01

+1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.73

3.48

+5.24

WSTAX vs. FAGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSTAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the FAGAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSTAX and FAGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WSTAX vs. FAGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSTAX drawdown since its inception was -55.39%, smaller than the maximum FAGAX drawdown of -65.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSTAX and FAGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSTAXFAGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.39%

-65.24%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.73%

-16.19%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.35%

-26.62%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.39%

-44.70%

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.39%

-44.70%

-10.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.75%

-8.15%

-1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.89%

-15.14%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

4.71%

+0.59%

Volatility

WSTAX vs. FAGAX - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A (WSTAX) has a higher volatility of 10.23% compared to Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX) at 7.92%. This indicates that WSTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSTAXFAGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.23%

7.92%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.94%

17.87%

+6.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.62%

21.51%

+7.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.65%

25.32%

+12.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.01%

24.10%

+6.91%

WSTAX vs. FAGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WSTAX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than FAGAX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

WSTAX vs. FAGAX - Dividend Comparison

WSTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.91%, more than FAGAX's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAGAX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A
3.83%4.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.19%5.45%4.10%11.99%7.67%15.44%11.12%
WSTAX
Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A
13.91%18.32%36.08%11.62%33.72%42.99%8.89%11.48%13.99%6.95%0.00%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, WSTAX and FAGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WSTAX has higher volatility (10.23%) compared to FAGAX (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSTAX dropped -55.39% vs FAGAX's -65.24%.

WSTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSTAX and FAGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer