WSTAX vs. MSEGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A (WSTAX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX).
WSTAX is managed by Nomura. MSEGX is an actively managed fund by Morgan Stanley. It was launched on Apr 2, 1991.
Performance
WSTAX vs. MSEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WSTAX vs. MSEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSTAX Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A | -6.53% | 33.91% | 59.64% | 40.44% | -32.50% | 14.19% | 36.12% | 50.35% | -5.23% | 32.77% |
MSEGX Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio | -19.09% | 24.43% | 46.29% | 49.87% | -60.27% | -0.31% | 115.11% | 38.93% | 5.01% | 43.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSTAX achieves a -6.53% return, which is significantly higher than MSEGX's -19.09% return. Over the past 10 years, WSTAX has outperformed MSEGX with an annualized return of 19.82%, while MSEGX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.96% annualized return.
WSTAX
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -11.47%
- YTD
- -6.53%
- 6M
- -3.97%
- 1Y
- 37.90%
- 3Y*
- 34.43%
- 5Y*
- 15.99%
- 10Y*
- 19.82%
MSEGX
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -8.78%
- YTD
- -19.09%
- 6M
- -25.14%
- 1Y
- 12.68%
- 3Y*
- 23.39%
- 5Y*
- -2.29%
- 10Y*
- 14.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WSTAX vs. MSEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WSTAX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than MSEGX's 0.87% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WSTAX vs. MSEGX — Risk / Return Rank
WSTAX
MSEGX
WSTAX vs. MSEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A (WSTAX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WSTAX | MSEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | 0.33 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 0.71 | +1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.09 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 0.25 | +1.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.93 | 0.66 | +6.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WSTAX | MSEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 0.33 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | -0.06 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.45 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.40 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between WSTAX and MSEGX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WSTAX vs. MSEGX - Dividend Comparison
WSTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.60%, while MSEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSTAX Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A | 19.60% | 18.32% | 36.08% | 11.62% | 33.72% | 42.99% | 8.89% | 11.48% | 13.99% | 6.95% | 0.00% | 2.50% |
MSEGX Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 18.70% | 26.52% | 10.03% | 22.75% | 5.67% | 22.18% | 13.17% | 7.76% |
Drawdowns
WSTAX vs. MSEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSTAX drawdown since its inception was -55.39%, smaller than the maximum MSEGX drawdown of -69.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSTAX and MSEGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSTAX | MSEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.39% | -69.57% | +14.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.73% | -27.83% | +11.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.39% | -69.57% | +14.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.39% | -69.57% | +14.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.73% | -30.07% | +13.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -19.49% | +4.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 10.49% | -5.71% |
Volatility
WSTAX vs. MSEGX - Volatility Comparison
Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A (WSTAX) has a higher volatility of 8.82% compared to Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX) at 8.12%. This indicates that WSTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WSTAX | MSEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.82% | 8.12% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.86% | 21.71% | -2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.32% | 33.16% | -3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.75% | 39.77% | -3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.55% | 33.60% | -3.05% |