WSTAX vs. GTTIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A (WSTAX) and Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I (GTTIX).
WSTAX is managed by Nomura. GTTIX is an actively managed fund by Gabelli. It was launched on Nov 1, 1993.
Performance
WSTAX vs. GTTIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WSTAX vs. GTTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSTAX Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A | -6.53% | 33.91% | 59.64% | 40.44% | -32.50% | 14.19% | 36.12% | 50.35% | -5.23% | 32.77% |
GTTIX Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I | -2.99% | 27.42% | 14.93% | 22.82% | -28.59% | 5.17% | 16.44% | 16.44% | -11.28% | 14.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSTAX achieves a -6.53% return, which is significantly lower than GTTIX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, WSTAX has outperformed GTTIX with an annualized return of 19.82%, while GTTIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.96% annualized return.
WSTAX
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -11.47%
- YTD
- -6.53%
- 6M
- -3.97%
- 1Y
- 37.90%
- 3Y*
- 34.43%
- 5Y*
- 15.99%
- 10Y*
- 19.82%
GTTIX
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -7.81%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -2.67%
- 1Y
- 19.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 4.59%
- 10Y*
- 5.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WSTAX vs. GTTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WSTAX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than GTTIX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WSTAX vs. GTTIX — Risk / Return Rank
WSTAX
GTTIX
WSTAX vs. GTTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A (WSTAX) and Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I (GTTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WSTAX | GTTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | 1.30 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 1.81 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.24 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 1.78 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.93 | 4.64 | +2.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WSTAX | GTTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 1.30 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.28 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.37 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.41 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between WSTAX and GTTIX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WSTAX vs. GTTIX - Dividend Comparison
WSTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.60%, more than GTTIX's 18.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSTAX Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A | 19.60% | 18.32% | 36.08% | 11.62% | 33.72% | 42.99% | 8.89% | 11.48% | 13.99% | 6.95% | 0.00% | 2.50% |
GTTIX Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I | 18.49% | 17.94% | 0.00% | 0.32% | 2.29% | 6.74% | 3.09% | 7.22% | 6.96% | 7.11% | 7.34% | 8.62% |
Drawdowns
WSTAX vs. GTTIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSTAX drawdown since its inception was -55.39%, which is greater than GTTIX's maximum drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSTAX and GTTIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSTAX | GTTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.39% | -39.84% | -15.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.73% | -9.45% | -7.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.39% | -39.84% | -15.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.39% | -39.84% | -15.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.73% | -7.99% | -8.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -8.22% | -6.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 3.67% | +1.11% |
Volatility
WSTAX vs. GTTIX - Volatility Comparison
Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A (WSTAX) has a higher volatility of 8.82% compared to Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I (GTTIX) at 4.71%. This indicates that WSTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WSTAX | GTTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.82% | 4.71% | +4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.86% | 9.96% | +8.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.32% | 14.62% | +14.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.75% | 16.26% | +20.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.55% | 16.30% | +14.25% |