PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTTIX vs. CCOYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTTIX vs. CCOYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I (GTTIX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTTIX achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly lower than CCOYX's 59.46% return.


GTTIX

1D
-1.18%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
12.42%
6M
12.95%
1Y
31.91%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
7.80%

CCOYX

1D
3.73%
1M
8.40%
YTD
59.46%
6M
56.90%
1Y
120.76%
3Y*
46.30%
5Y*
27.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTTIX vs. CCOYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTTIX
Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I
12.42%27.42%14.93%22.82%-28.59%5.17%16.44%16.44%-11.28%9.93%
CCOYX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class
59.46%37.79%27.11%44.77%-30.92%39.45%44.92%54.68%-7.78%19.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GTTIX and CCOYX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2017

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between GTTIX and CCOYX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTTIX vs. CCOYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTTIX
GTTIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GTTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GTTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

CCOYX
CCOYX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CCOYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTTIX vs. CCOYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I (GTTIX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTTIXCCOYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.63

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

9.90

-6.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

36.23

-27.04

GTTIX vs. CCOYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is lower than the CCOYX Sharpe Ratio of 4.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTTIX and CCOYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTTIX vs. CCOYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTTIX drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, which is greater than CCOYX's maximum drawdown of -37.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTTIX and CCOYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTTIXCCOYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.84%

-37.16%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.08%

-12.31%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.74%

-29.08%

+13.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.84%

-37.16%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.14%

0.00%

-6.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-7.67%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

3.36%

+0.32%

Volatility

GTTIX vs. CCOYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I (GTTIX) is 6.22%, while Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX) has a volatility of 11.53%. This indicates that GTTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCOYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTTIXCCOYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

11.53%

-5.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.40%

21.80%

-10.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.67%

27.70%

-13.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

26.55%

-10.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.44%

26.89%

-10.45%

GTTIX vs. CCOYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTTIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CCOYX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTTIX vs. CCOYX - Dividend Comparison

GTTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.95%, more than CCOYX's 5.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCOYX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class
5.07%8.08%12.32%4.60%8.17%10.62%9.52%10.61%11.42%10.60%0.00%0.00%
GTTIX
Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I
15.95%17.94%0.00%0.32%2.29%6.74%3.09%7.22%6.96%7.11%7.34%8.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTTIX and CCOYX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCOYX has higher volatility (11.53%) compared to GTTIX (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTTIX dropped -39.84% vs CCOYX's -37.16%.

CCOYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.40 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTTIX and CCOYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer