FGIPX vs. BUFBX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FGIPX (Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class) and BUFBX (Buffalo Flexible Income Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FGIPX returned 13.23%/yr vs 9.49%/yr for BUFBX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGIPX charges 0.77%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for BUFBX.

Performance

FGIPX vs. BUFBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGIPX achieves a 18.47% return, which is significantly higher than BUFBX's 8.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FGIPX has outperformed BUFBX with an annualized return of 13.23%, while BUFBX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.49% annualized return.

FGIPX

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 2.80%
• YTD: 18.47%
• 6M: 17.70%
• 1Y: 43.42%
• 3Y*: 25.71%
• 5Y*: 17.59%
• 10Y*: 13.23%

BUFBX

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -4.45%
• YTD: 8.04%
• 6M: 8.15%
• 1Y: 14.29%
• 3Y*: 11.59%
• 5Y*: 10.73%
• 10Y*: 9.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGIPX vs. BUFBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGIPX Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class	18.47%	30.18%	15.44%	12.17%	3.28%	21.73%	-4.59%	25.96%	-9.95%	18.52%
BUFBX Buffalo Flexible Income Fund	8.04%	10.37%	10.26%	7.42%	3.97%	29.97%	-2.27%	18.76%	-7.01%	13.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FGIPX and BUFBX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2013	0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between FGIPX and BUFBX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FGIPX vs. BUFBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGIPX

FGIPX Risk / Return Rank: 96
FGIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FGIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FGIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FGIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FGIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

BUFBX

BUFBX Risk / Return Rank: 47
BUFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
BUFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
BUFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
BUFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
BUFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGIPX vs. BUFBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGIPX	BUFBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.74	1.56	+2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.13	2.19	+2.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.67	1.27	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.08	3.21	+2.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.11	11.59	+11.52

FGIPX vs. BUFBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGIPX Sharpe Ratio is 3.74, which is higher than the BUFBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGIPX and BUFBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGIPX vs. BUFBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGIPX drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, smaller than the maximum BUFBX drawdown of -39.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIPX and BUFBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGIPX	BUFBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.32%	-39.78%	+2.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.26%	-4.45%	-2.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.27%	-12.85%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.19%	-14.67%	-1.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.32%	-35.51%	-1.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-4.45%	+3.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.16%	-4.72%	+0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	1.23%	+0.67%

Volatility

FGIPX vs. BUFBX - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX) at 3.42%. This indicates that FGIPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGIPX	BUFBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.14%	3.42%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.80%	6.93%	+1.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.81%	9.18%	+2.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.93%	13.42%	+1.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.14%	15.61%	+1.53%

FGIPX vs. BUFBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGIPX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFBX's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGIPX vs. BUFBX - Dividend Comparison

FGIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.60%, more than BUFBX's 8.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUFBX Buffalo Flexible Income Fund	8.43%	9.10%	3.77%	3.48%	4.16%	5.57%	3.33%	2.73%	6.01%	5.49%	2.39%	3.67%
FGIPX Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class	9.60%	11.68%	12.69%	7.50%	7.35%	12.20%	2.13%	52.72%	25.63%	5.58%	4.22%	5.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGIPX and BUFBX in my portfolio?

FGIPX and BUFBX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGIPX or BUFBX?

FGIPX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to BUFBX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGIPX dropped -37.32% vs BUFBX's -39.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.