PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSHFX vs. NBSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WSHFX vs. NBSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-1 (WSHFX) and Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSHFX achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than NBSRX's 11.18% return. Over the past 10 years, WSHFX has underperformed NBSRX with an annualized return of 12.76%, while NBSRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.36% annualized return.


WSHFX

1D
0.40%
1M
2.80%
YTD
5.86%
6M
5.98%
1Y
17.49%
3Y*
18.18%
5Y*
11.85%
10Y*
12.76%

NBSRX

1D
-0.42%
1M
3.23%
YTD
11.18%
6M
16.70%
1Y
27.64%
3Y*
24.06%
5Y*
13.65%
10Y*
14.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WSHFX vs. NBSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WSHFX
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-1
5.86%17.13%18.94%17.15%-8.50%28.36%7.62%24.82%-6.27%19.91%
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
11.18%17.37%28.23%26.76%-18.81%23.30%19.35%25.95%-6.00%18.84%

Correlation

The correlation between WSHFX and NBSRX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2001

0.91

The correlation between WSHFX and NBSRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSHFX vs. NBSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSHFX
WSHFX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
WSHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
WSHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

NBSRX
NBSRX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NBSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
NBSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WSHFX vs. NBSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-1 (WSHFX) and Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WSHFXNBSRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

2.80

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.40

12.04

-2.64

WSHFX vs. NBSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSHFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the NBSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSHFX and NBSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WSHFXNBSRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

2.13

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.85

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.82

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.59

-0.09

Drawdowns

WSHFX vs. NBSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSHFX drawdown since its inception was -53.94%, roughly equal to the maximum NBSRX drawdown of -53.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSHFX and NBSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSHFXNBSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.94%

-53.74%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.38%

-10.03%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.65%

-16.28%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.69%

-25.39%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.67%

-34.07%

-0.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.42%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-7.06%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.32%

-0.38%

Volatility

WSHFX vs. NBSRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-1 (WSHFX) is 2.42%, while Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that WSHFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSHFXNBSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

2.86%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

10.48%

-2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.31%

13.17%

-2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

16.14%

-2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

17.49%

-1.16%

WSHFX vs. NBSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WSHFX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than NBSRX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

WSHFX vs. NBSRX - Dividend Comparison

WSHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.55%, more than NBSRX's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
2.12%2.35%5.88%9.72%10.06%10.35%6.16%9.08%10.03%6.14%4.53%6.40%
WSHFX
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-1
9.55%10.08%10.05%6.11%6.28%6.01%3.02%6.17%4.28%7.19%6.32%6.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


WSHFX and NBSRX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBSRX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to WSHFX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSHFX dropped -53.94% vs NBSRX's -53.74%.

NBSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSHFX and NBSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer