PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSDB vs. JABS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WSDB vs. JABS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Weitz Short Duration Bond ETF (WSDB) and Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WSDB

1D
0.11%
1M
0.01%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

JABS

1D
0.11%
1M
0.24%
6M
1.70%
YTD
1.91%
1Y
4.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$396.53K$231.42K$325.08K
$24.48K$93.50K$46.51K

WSDB vs. JABS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WSDB and JABS is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSDB vs. JABS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WSDB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


JABS
JABS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
JABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
JABS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
JABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
JABS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WSDB vs. JABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weitz Short Duration Bond ETF (WSDB) and Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WSDBJABSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.82

WSDB vs. JABS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WSDB vs. JABS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSDB drawdown since its inception was -0.56%, smaller than the maximum JABS drawdown of -0.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSDB and JABS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSDBJABSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-0.97%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.18%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.17%

-0.17%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

Volatility

WSDB vs. JABS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSDBJABSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44%

1.99%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.44%

2.01%

-0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.44%

2.01%

-0.57%

WSDB vs. JABS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WSDB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than JABS's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

WSDB vs. JABS - Dividend Comparison

WSDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than JABS's 4.99% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


WSDB and JABS have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JABS is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JABS is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WSDB.

JABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 1.09% for WSDB.

They also come from different issuers: Weitz and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WSDB and 0.33% for JABS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSDB and JABS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer