WSDB vs. BBSB
WSDB (Weitz Short Duration Bond ETF) and BBSB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WSDB is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Weitz, while BBSB is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. WSDB is actively managed, while BBSB is passively managed. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. WSDB charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BBSB.
Performance
WSDB vs. BBSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WSDB
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BBSB
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 2.74%
- 3Y*
- 4.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $121.99K | $103.49K | $385.62K | |
| $24.48K | $93.50K | $46.51K |
WSDB vs. BBSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WSDB Weitz Short Duration Bond ETF | 0.59% |
BBSB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF | 0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between WSDB and BBSB is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WSDB vs. BBSB — Risk / Return Rank
WSDB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BBSB
WSDB vs. BBSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weitz Short Duration Bond ETF (WSDB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WSDB | BBSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.21 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WSDB vs. BBSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSDB drawdown since its inception was -0.56%, smaller than the maximum BBSB drawdown of -1.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSDB and BBSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSDB | BBSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.56% | -1.57% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | 0.00% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -0.30% | +0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.21% | — |
Volatility
WSDB vs. BBSB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WSDB | BBSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44% | 1.19% | +0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.44% | 1.65% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.44% | 1.65% | -0.21% |
WSDB vs. BBSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
WSDB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSB's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
WSDB vs. BBSB - Dividend Comparison
WSDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than BBSB's 3.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF | 3.79% | 3.69% | 4.84% | 3.50% |
WSDB Weitz Short Duration Bond ETF | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WSDB and BBSB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBSB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBSB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WSDB.
BBSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 1.09% for WSDB.
WSDB is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BBSB is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Weitz and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WSDB and 0.04% for BBSB.
Find the right allocation for WSDB and BBSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer