WSDB vs. BSV
WSDB (Weitz Short Duration Bond ETF) and BSV (Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares) are both Short-Term Bond funds. WSDB is actively managed, while BSV is passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WSDB charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BSV.
Performance
WSDB vs. BSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WSDB
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSV
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 3.51%
- 3Y*
- 4.54%
- 5Y*
- 1.70%
- 10Y*
- 1.94%
WSDB vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WSDB Weitz Short Duration Bond ETF | 0.68% |
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 0.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between WSDB and BSV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WSDB vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank
WSDB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSV
WSDB vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weitz Short Duration Bond ETF (WSDB) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WSDB | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WSDB vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSDB drawdown since its inception was -0.56%, smaller than the maximum BSV drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSDB and BSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSDB | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.56% | -8.54% | +7.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.33% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.15% | -0.97% | +0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.40% | — |
Volatility
WSDB vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WSDB | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50% | 1.84% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.50% | 2.74% | -1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.50% | 2.38% | -0.88% |
WSDB vs. BSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
WSDB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BSV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
WSDB vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison
WSDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than BSV's 4.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 4.01% | 3.83% | 3.38% | 2.46% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.79% | 2.29% | 1.99% | 1.65% | 1.48% | 1.40% |
WSDB Weitz Short Duration Bond ETF | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WSDB and BSV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WSDB.
BSV has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 0.80% for WSDB.
They also come from different issuers: Weitz and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WSDB and 0.03% for BSV.
Find the right allocation for WSDB and BSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer