PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSC vs. MEDP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WSC vs. MEDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. (WSC) and Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSC achieves a 50.30% return, which is significantly higher than MEDP's -16.79% return.


WSC

1D
2.63%
1M
8.95%
YTD
50.30%
6M
38.74%
1Y
2.61%
3Y*
-15.55%
5Y*
-0.59%
10Y*

MEDP

1D
-1.63%
1M
10.28%
YTD
-16.79%
6M
-16.23%
1Y
53.73%
3Y*
28.75%
5Y*
21.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WSC vs. MEDP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WSC
WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp.
50.30%-43.07%-24.83%-1.48%10.60%76.26%25.31%96.28%-25.83%30.26%
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
-16.79%69.05%8.38%44.31%-2.40%56.35%65.60%58.81%45.97%6.77%

Correlation

The correlation between WSC and MEDP is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017

0.36

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WSC:

$5.10B

MEDP:

$13.54B

EPS

WSC:

-$0.37

MEDP:

$15.63

PS Ratio

WSC:

2.26

MEDP:

5.14

PB Ratio

WSC:

5.86

MEDP:

22.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

WSC:

$2.27B

MEDP:

$2.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WSC:

$1.10B

MEDP:

$778.59M

EBITDA (TTM)

WSC:

$410.10M

MEDP:

$572.96M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSC vs. MEDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSC
WSC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
WSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
WSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSC Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

MEDP
MEDP Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MEDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEDP Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MEDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEDP Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WSC vs. MEDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. (WSC) and Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WSCMEDPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.32

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

1.48

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.09

3.28

-3.19

WSC vs. MEDP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the MEDP Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSC and MEDP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WSC vs. MEDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSC drawdown since its inception was -71.54%, which is greater than MEDP's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSC and MEDP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSCMEDPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.54%

-42.87%

-28.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.53%

-36.61%

-15.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.72%

-39.38%

-31.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.54%

-42.87%

-28.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.04%

-24.69%

-21.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.82%

-12.92%

-7.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.16%

16.45%

+13.71%

Volatility

WSC vs. MEDP - Volatility Comparison

WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. (WSC) has a higher volatility of 13.36% compared to Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) at 6.83%. This indicates that WSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEDP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSCMEDPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.36%

6.83%

+6.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.60%

37.78%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.17%

68.99%

-16.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.18%

51.61%

-10.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.42%

49.76%

-5.34%

Dividends

WSC vs. MEDP - Dividend Comparison

WSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while MEDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%
WSC
WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp.
1.00%1.49%

Financials

WSC vs. MEDP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. and Medpace Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M20222023202420252026
548.63M
706.60M
(WSC) Total Revenue
(MEDP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WSC vs. MEDP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. and Medpace Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
52.1%
27.8%
Portfolio components
WSC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 285.68M and revenue of 548.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.1%.

MEDP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 196.33M and revenue of 706.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.8%.

WSC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 96.66M and revenue of 548.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

MEDP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 141.50M and revenue of 706.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.0%.

WSC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 28.12M and revenue of 548.63M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.

MEDP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 123.87M and revenue of 706.60M, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WSC and MEDP have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WSC has higher volatility (13.36%) compared to MEDP (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSC dropped -71.54% vs MEDP's -42.87%.

MEDP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSC and MEDP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer