PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSBFX vs. TSAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WSBFX vs. TSAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Trust Walden Balanced Fund (WSBFX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSBFX achieves a 8.28% return, which is significantly lower than TSAIX's 10.73% return. Over the past 10 years, WSBFX has underperformed TSAIX with an annualized return of 8.59%, while TSAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.71% annualized return.


WSBFX

1D
0.82%
1M
0.77%
6M
6.87%
YTD
8.28%
1Y
17.06%
3Y*
10.11%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*
8.59%
ALL TIME*
6.25%

TSAIX

1D
1.15%
1M
1.36%
6M
7.58%
YTD
10.73%
1Y
20.81%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
11.71%
ALL TIME*
11.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

WSBFX vs. TSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WSBFX
Boston Trust Walden Balanced Fund
8.28%10.63%6.86%12.21%-13.64%19.35%8.81%24.56%-1.90%13.98%
TSAIX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund
10.73%20.04%15.46%22.72%-19.57%17.10%19.69%27.97%-11.27%22.35%

Correlation

The correlation between WSBFX and TSAIX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2011

0.91

The correlation between WSBFX and TSAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSBFX vs. TSAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WSBFX
WSBFX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
WSBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
WSBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

TSAIX
TSAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TSAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TSAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WSBFX vs. TSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Trust Walden Balanced Fund (WSBFX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WSBFXTSAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.29

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

2.22

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.03

9.31

+3.71

WSBFX vs. TSAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the TSAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSBFX and TSAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WSBFX vs. TSAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSBFX drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum TSAIX drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSBFX and TSAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSBFXTSAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-34.58%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.31%

-10.28%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.46%

-17.29%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.94%

-28.28%

+8.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.21%

-34.58%

+10.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-4.88%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

2.44%

-1.04%

Volatility

WSBFX vs. TSAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boston Trust Walden Balanced Fund (WSBFX) is 2.37%, while TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that WSBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSBFXTSAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

4.43%

-2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.49%

11.84%

-5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.23%

14.29%

-6.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.98%

16.44%

-4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.29%

17.62%

-5.33%

WSBFX vs. TSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WSBFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TSAIX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

WSBFX vs. TSAIX - Dividend Comparison

WSBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than TSAIX's 6.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TSAIX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund
6.67%7.38%2.94%1.81%9.27%11.82%5.59%5.71%5.71%1.13%4.12%7.19%
WSBFX
Boston Trust Walden Balanced Fund
7.36%7.97%4.75%7.68%3.66%3.51%3.42%2.30%2.19%1.02%3.06%7.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


WSBFX and TSAIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSAIX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to WSBFX (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSBFX dropped -32.01% vs TSAIX's -34.58%.

WSBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSBFX and TSAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer