PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSBFX vs. BTEFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WSBFX vs. BTEFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Trust Walden Balanced Fund (WSBFX) and Boston Trust Equity Fund (BTEFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSBFX achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly higher than BTEFX's 0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, WSBFX has underperformed BTEFX with an annualized return of 8.89%, while BTEFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.05% annualized return.


WSBFX

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.25%
YTD
6.44%
6M
6.02%
1Y
18.39%
3Y*
10.27%
5Y*
6.02%
10Y*
8.89%

BTEFX

1D
-1.09%
1M
-3.11%
YTD
0.98%
6M
0.40%
1Y
10.43%
3Y*
10.44%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
12.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WSBFX vs. BTEFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WSBFX
Boston Trust Walden Balanced Fund
6.44%10.63%6.86%12.21%-13.64%19.35%8.81%24.56%-1.90%13.98%
BTEFX
Boston Trust Equity Fund
0.98%8.85%13.70%17.29%-14.15%29.74%14.66%31.87%-2.55%18.76%

Correlation

The correlation between WSBFX and BTEFX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2003

0.97

The correlation between WSBFX and BTEFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSBFX vs. BTEFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSBFX
WSBFX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
WSBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
WSBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BTEFX
BTEFX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BTEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BTEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WSBFX vs. BTEFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Trust Walden Balanced Fund (WSBFX) and Boston Trust Equity Fund (BTEFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WSBFXBTEFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.20

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

1.36

+1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.95

5.56

+8.39

WSBFX vs. BTEFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the BTEFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSBFX and BTEFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WSBFX vs. BTEFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSBFX drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum BTEFX drawdown of -47.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSBFX and BTEFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSBFXBTEFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-47.71%

+15.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.31%

-8.42%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.46%

-16.59%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.94%

-23.03%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.21%

-32.83%

+8.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-3.38%

+2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-5.56%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

2.06%

-0.68%

Volatility

WSBFX vs. BTEFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boston Trust Walden Balanced Fund (WSBFX) is 2.73%, while Boston Trust Equity Fund (BTEFX) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that WSBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTEFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSBFXBTEFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

3.12%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.23%

7.41%

-1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.97%

9.95%

-1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.96%

15.19%

-3.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.31%

17.01%

-4.70%

WSBFX vs. BTEFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WSBFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BTEFX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

WSBFX vs. BTEFX - Dividend Comparison

WSBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than BTEFX's 7.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTEFX
Boston Trust Equity Fund
7.25%7.33%2.50%1.54%3.16%2.65%2.91%1.01%1.80%0.98%6.71%7.63%
WSBFX
Boston Trust Walden Balanced Fund
7.49%7.97%4.75%7.68%3.66%3.51%3.42%2.30%2.19%1.02%3.06%7.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


WSBFX and BTEFX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTEFX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to WSBFX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSBFX dropped -32.01% vs BTEFX's -47.71%.

WSBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSBFX and BTEFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer