WRTH vs. TLTX
WRTH (Worth Charting Options Income ETF) and TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WRTH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Tidal, while TLTX is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Their 0.00 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WRTH charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TLTX.
Performance
WRTH vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WRTH
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TLTX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- 6M
- -2.25%
- YTD
- -2.60%
- 1Y
- -0.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $161.97K | $191.43K | $332.84K | |
| $1.43M | $1.25M | $1.45M |
WRTH vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WRTH Worth Charting Options Income ETF | 3.57% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | -3.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between WRTH and TLTX is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2026 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WRTH vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank
WRTH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TLTX
WRTH vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Worth Charting Options Income ETF (WRTH) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WRTH | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.00 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WRTH vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRTH drawdown since its inception was -6.20%, smaller than the maximum TLTX drawdown of -6.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRTH and TLTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRTH | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -6.70% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.76% | -6.20% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.93% | -2.52% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.08% | — |
Volatility
WRTH vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WRTH | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.81% | 9.45% | +7.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 9.41% | +7.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 9.41% | +7.40% |
WRTH vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WRTH has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
WRTH vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison
WRTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than TLTX's 19.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 19.20% | 7.54% |
WRTH Worth Charting Options Income ETF | 1.61% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WRTH and TLTX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for WRTH.
TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 19.20%, compared with 1.61% for WRTH.
WRTH is categorized as Derivative Income, while TLTX is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for WRTH and 0.29% for TLTX.
Find the right allocation for WRTH and TLTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer