WRTH vs. QQA

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

WRTH (Worth Charting Options Income ETF) and QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.12 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. WRTH charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QQA.

Performance

WRTH vs. QQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Worth Charting Options Income ETF (WRTH) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WRTH

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 1.48%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

QQA

• 1D: 2.44%
• 1M: 1.51%
• 6M: 12.57%
• YTD: 13.41%
• 1Y: 23.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	$6.82M	$6.97M	$6.88M
WRTH Worth Charting Options Income ETF	$1.43M	$1.25M	$1.45M

WRTH vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WRTH Worth Charting Options Income ETF	3.57%
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	6.95%

Correlation

The correlation between WRTH and QQA is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2026	-0.12

Return for Risk

WRTH vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WRTH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQA

QQA Risk / Return Rank: 61
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 53
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WRTH vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Worth Charting Options Income ETF (WRTH) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WRTH	QQA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.53	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.15	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.68	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.82	—

Drawdowns

WRTH vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRTH drawdown since its inception was -6.20%, smaller than the maximum QQA drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRTH and QQA.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRTH	QQA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.20%	-19.73%	+13.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.76%	-1.21%	-3.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.93%	-2.57%	+0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.38%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WRTH	QQA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.20%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.89%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.81%	15.41%	+1.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.81%	18.73%	-1.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.81%	18.73%	-1.92%

WRTH vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRTH has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

WRTH vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison

WRTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than QQA's 9.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	9.76%	9.78%	4.29%
WRTH Worth Charting Options Income ETF	1.61%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WRTH and QQA in my portfolio?

WRTH and QQA have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WRTH or QQA?

On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WRTH or QQA?

QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for WRTH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WRTH or QQA?

QQA has the higher dividend yield at 9.76%, compared with 1.61% for WRTH.

What is the main difference between WRTH and QQA?

They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for WRTH and 0.29% for QQA.