WRND vs. SFGV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WRND (IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF) and SFGV (Sequoia Global Value ETF) are both Global Equities funds. WRND is passively managed, while SFGV is actively managed. Over the past year, WRND returned 39.52% vs 25.44% for SFGV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WRND charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for SFGV.

Performance

WRND vs. SFGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) and Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRND achieves a 16.08% return, which is significantly higher than SFGV's 11.37% return.

WRND

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 5.16%
• YTD: 16.08%
• 6M: 16.09%
• 1Y: 39.52%
• 3Y*: 22.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SFGV

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 3.27%
• YTD: 11.37%
• 6M: 11.60%
• 1Y: 25.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRND vs. SFGV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WRND IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF	16.08%	27.72%	14.55%
SFGV Sequoia Global Value ETF	11.37%	18.84%	10.71%

Correlation

The correlation between WRND and SFGV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2024	0.74

The correlation between WRND and SFGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

WRND vs. SFGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WRND	SFGV
Technology	49.9%	11.4%
Industrials	14.0%	13.7%
Communication Services	13.2%	3.4%
Healthcare	11.7%	12.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	15.3%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	8.8%
Basic Materials	1.0%	6.0%
Energy	-	11.4%
Financial Services	-	10.5%
Real Estate	-	5.9%
Utilities	-	1.0%

Return for Risk

WRND vs. SFGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRND

WRND Risk / Return Rank: 69
WRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
WRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
WRND Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
WRND Martin Ratio Rank: 72

SFGV

SFGV Risk / Return Rank: 66
SFGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SFGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
SFGV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
SFGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SFGV Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRND vs. SFGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) and Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WRND	SFGV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	2.21	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	3.17	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.39	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	3.06	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.52	11.43	+2.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WRND vs. SFGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRND Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the SFGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRND and SFGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WRND	SFGV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	2.21	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	1.33	-0.52

Drawdowns

WRND vs. SFGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRND drawdown since its inception was -27.16%, which is greater than SFGV's maximum drawdown of -14.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRND and SFGV.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRND	SFGV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.16%	-14.51%	-12.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.43%	-8.36%	-4.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	-0.38%	-0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.97%	-1.89%	-4.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	2.23%	+0.70%

Volatility

WRND vs. SFGV - Volatility Comparison

IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) at 2.95%. This indicates that WRND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WRND	SFGV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	2.95%	+1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.45%	8.62%	+4.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.81%	11.58%	+5.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.79%	13.26%	+5.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.79%	13.26%	+5.53%

WRND vs. SFGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRND has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SFGV's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

WRND vs. SFGV - Dividend Comparison

WRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than SFGV's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
SFGV Sequoia Global Value ETF	2.25%	2.52%	2.23%	0.00%	0.00%
WRND IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF	0.99%	1.29%	1.15%	2.06%	2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WRND and SFGV in my portfolio?

WRND and SFGV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WRND or SFGV?

WRND has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to SFGV (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRND dropped -27.16% vs SFGV's -14.51%.

Which ETF is better, WRND or SFGV?

On 1-year performance, WRND leads with 39.52% vs 25.44% for SFGV. On fees, WRND is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, SFGV has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WRND or SFGV?

Over the 1-year period, WRND has performed better with a 39.52% return vs 25.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WRND or SFGV?

WRND is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for SFGV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WRND or SFGV?

SFGV has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 0.99% for WRND.

What is the main difference between WRND and SFGV?

They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and Sequoia. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WRND and 0.33% for SFGV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WRND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.