PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WRND vs. CAPE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WRND vs. CAPE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) and iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WRND vs. CAPE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WRND
IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF
-3.11%27.72%13.46%34.85%-18.12%
CAPE
iPath Shiller CAPE ETN
-4.29%9.10%14.40%27.65%-15.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRND achieves a -3.11% return, which is significantly higher than CAPE's -4.29% return.


WRND

1D
4.07%
1M
-6.90%
YTD
-3.11%
6M
-0.04%
1Y
22.97%
3Y*
17.80%
5Y*
10Y*

CAPE

1D
2.22%
1M
-7.33%
YTD
-4.29%
6M
-4.53%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
12.22%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WRND vs. CAPE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRND has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CAPE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WRND vs. CAPE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRND
WRND Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
WRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRND Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRND Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

CAPE
CAPE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CAPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAPE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CAPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAPE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRND vs. CAPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) and iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WRNDCAPEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

0.20

+0.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

0.40

+1.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.05

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

0.37

+1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.86

1.50

+5.36

WRND vs. CAPE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRND Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the CAPE Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRND and CAPE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WRNDCAPEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

0.20

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.39

+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between WRND and CAPE is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

WRND vs. CAPE - Dividend Comparison

WRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than CAPE's 1.46% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
WRND
IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF
1.18%1.29%1.15%2.06%2.06%
CAPE
iPath Shiller CAPE ETN
1.46%1.39%1.23%1.01%0.80%

Drawdowns

WRND vs. CAPE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRND drawdown since its inception was -27.16%, which is greater than CAPE's maximum drawdown of -22.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRND and CAPE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WRNDCAPEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.16%

-22.07%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-10.89%

-1.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.87%

-7.33%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.16%

-5.00%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

2.71%

+0.55%

Volatility

WRND vs. CAPE - Volatility Comparison

IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) at 5.09%. This indicates that WRND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAPE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WRNDCAPEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.10%

5.09%

+3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.20%

8.01%

+5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.59%

15.07%

+5.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.78%

17.14%

+1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

17.14%

+1.64%