WRB vs. MOAT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

WRB (W. R. Berkley Corporation) is a stock, while MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Over the past 10 years, WRB returned 17.92%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for MOAT. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WRB vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRB achieves a -2.51% return, which is significantly lower than MOAT's -0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, WRB has outperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 17.92%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.47% annualized return.

WRB

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 2.74%
• YTD: -2.51%
• 6M: 0.17%
• 1Y: -4.36%
• 3Y*: 24.41%
• 5Y*: 17.90%
• 10Y*: 17.92%

MOAT

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 3.19%
• YTD: -0.66%
• 6M: -1.22%
• 1Y: 14.57%
• 3Y*: 10.55%
• 5Y*: 7.78%
• 10Y*: 13.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRB vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation	-2.51%	23.02%	27.19%	0.25%	33.92%	27.39%	-3.14%	43.80%	5.96%	10.21%
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	-0.66%	13.20%	10.73%	31.89%	-13.66%	24.12%	14.84%	34.79%	-1.28%	23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between WRB and MOAT is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012	0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between WRB and MOAT has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

WRB vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRB

WRB Risk / Return Rank: 31
WRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
WRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
WRB Omega Ratio Rank: 28
WRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
WRB Martin Ratio Rank: 33

MOAT

MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 26
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 26
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRB vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WRB	MOAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	0.91	-1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.18	1.39	-1.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.16	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	1.02	-1.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.54	3.11	-3.65

WRB vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRB Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRB and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WRB vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRB drawdown since its inception was -69.33%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRB and MOAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRB	MOAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.33%	-33.31%	-36.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.62%	-12.43%	-5.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.62%	-21.44%	+3.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.29%	-23.96%	-2.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.35%	-33.31%	-12.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.49%	-4.45%	-7.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.58%	-3.83%	-10.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.29%	4.06%	+5.23%

Volatility

WRB vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.13%. This indicates that WRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WRB	MOAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.63%	4.13%	+3.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.08%	9.90%	+5.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.37%	13.93%	+7.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.83%	18.20%	+4.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.56%	18.68%	+5.88%

Dividends

WRB vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

WRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than MOAT's 1.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	1.36%	1.36%	1.37%	0.86%	1.25%	1.08%	1.46%	1.31%	1.79%	1.07%	1.17%	2.13%
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation	2.72%	2.64%	2.39%	2.73%	1.22%	2.44%	0.71%	2.43%	2.83%	2.16%	2.27%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WRB and MOAT in my portfolio?

WRB and MOAT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WRB or MOAT?

WRB has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to MOAT (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRB dropped -69.33% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.