WRAIX vs. JAKVX
WRAIX (Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund) and JAKVX (John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past year, WRAIX returned 8.07% vs 27.08% for JAKVX. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WRAIX charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for JAKVX.
Performance
WRAIX vs. JAKVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WRAIX achieves a 3.69% return, which is significantly lower than JAKVX's 13.36% return.
WRAIX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 3.69%
- 6M
- 4.16%
- 1Y
- 8.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- 5.40%
JAKVX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 13.36%
- 6M
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- 27.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WRAIX vs. JAKVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WRAIX Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund | 3.69% | 7.10% |
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 | 13.36% | 17.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between WRAIX and JAKVX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.50 |
The correlation between WRAIX and JAKVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WRAIX vs. JAKVX — Risk / Return Rank
WRAIX
JAKVX
WRAIX vs. JAKVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WRAIX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 3.76 | -2.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.05 | 5.36 | -3.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.76 | -0.47 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 5.46 | -3.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | 19.21 | -12.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WRAIX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 3.76 | -2.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 4.09 | -3.41 |
Drawdowns
WRAIX vs. JAKVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRAIX drawdown since its inception was -15.44%, which is greater than JAKVX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRAIX and JAKVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRAIX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.44% | -5.16% | -10.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.03% | -5.16% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -0.33% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.98% | -0.80% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 1.47% | -0.28% |
Volatility
WRAIX vs. JAKVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) is 1.48%, while John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) has a volatility of 2.46%. This indicates that WRAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JAKVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WRAIX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 2.46% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.71% | 5.88% | -1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.92% | 7.50% | -1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.47% | 7.33% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.73% | 7.33% | -0.60% |
WRAIX vs. JAKVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WRAIX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than JAKVX's 1.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
WRAIX vs. JAKVX - Dividend Comparison
WRAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than JAKVX's 7.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 | 7.48% | 8.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WRAIX Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund | 0.17% | 0.17% | 1.47% | 1.31% | 2.77% | 0.52% | 1.98% | 1.15% | 1.25% | 1.15% | 0.30% | 2.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WRAIX and JAKVX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JAKVX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to WRAIX (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRAIX dropped -15.44% vs JAKVX's -5.16%.
JAKVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WRAIX and JAKVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer