WQTM vs. STPZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WQTM (WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund) and STPZ (PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WQTM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while STPZ is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y). WQTM is actively managed, while STPZ is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. WQTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for STPZ.

Performance

WQTM vs. STPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WQTM achieves a 46.02% return, which is significantly higher than STPZ's 1.01% return.

WQTM

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -1.36%
• YTD: 46.02%
• 6M: 40.51%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

STPZ

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -0.36%
• YTD: 1.01%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 3.26%
• 3Y*: 4.81%
• 5Y*: 2.83%
• 10Y*: 2.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WQTM vs. STPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund	46.02%	-13.35%
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF	1.01%	0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between WQTM and STPZ is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	-0.02

Return for Risk

WQTM vs. STPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WQTM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

STPZ

STPZ Risk / Return Rank: 60
STPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
STPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
STPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
STPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
STPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WQTM vs. STPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WQTM	STPZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.68	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.46	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.51	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.76	—

Drawdowns

WQTM vs. STPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WQTM drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, which is greater than STPZ's maximum drawdown of -6.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQTM and STPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	WQTM	STPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.13%	-6.77%	-19.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-6.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-6.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.52%	-0.87%	-7.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.57%	-1.30%	-10.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.30%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WQTM	STPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.39%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.37%	1.95%	+41.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.37%	3.29%	+40.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.37%	2.99%	+40.38%

WQTM vs. STPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

WQTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than STPZ's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

WQTM vs. STPZ - Dividend Comparison

WQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF	4.14%	3.65%	1.97%	1.63%	5.88%	3.65%	1.86%	1.76%	2.23%	1.51%	0.65%	0.49%
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WQTM and STPZ in my portfolio?

WQTM and STPZ have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WQTM or STPZ?

On fees, STPZ is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WQTM or STPZ?

STPZ is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WQTM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WQTM or STPZ?

STPZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 0.00% for WQTM.

What is the main difference between WQTM and STPZ?

WQTM is categorized as Technology Equities, while STPZ is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WQTM and 0.20% for STPZ.