WQTM vs. PXQ
WQTM (WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund) and PXQ (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. WQTM is actively managed, while PXQ is passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WQTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for PXQ.
Performance
WQTM vs. PXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WQTM achieves a 46.02% return, which is significantly lower than PXQ's 54.15% return.
WQTM
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 46.02%
- 6M
- 40.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PXQ
- 1D
- -5.38%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 54.15%
- 6M
- 54.94%
- 1Y
- 84.85%
- 3Y*
- 40.93%
- 5Y*
- 19.32%
- 10Y*
- 21.11%
WQTM vs. PXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 46.02% | -13.35% |
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 54.15% | 2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between WQTM and PXQ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WQTM vs. PXQ — Risk / Return Rank
WQTM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PXQ
WQTM vs. PXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WQTM | PXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.57 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 30.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WQTM vs. PXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WQTM drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum PXQ drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQTM and PXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WQTM | PXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -57.18% | +31.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.52% | -6.27% | -2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.57% | -10.73% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.84% | — |
Volatility
WQTM vs. PXQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WQTM | PXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.37% | 25.15% | +18.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.37% | 23.96% | +19.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.37% | 23.33% | +20.04% |
WQTM vs. PXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
WQTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PXQ's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
WQTM vs. PXQ - Dividend Comparison
WQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 0.62% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% |
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WQTM and PXQ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PXQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PXQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WQTM.
PXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for WQTM.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WQTM and 0.40% for PXQ.
Find the right allocation for WQTM and PXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer