WQTM vs. NXTG
WQTM (WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund) and NXTG (First Trust IndXX NextG ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. WQTM is actively managed, while NXTG is passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WQTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for NXTG.
Performance
WQTM vs. NXTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WQTM having a 53.55% return and NXTG slightly higher at 54.54%.
WQTM
- 1D
- -3.80%
- 1M
- 23.76%
- YTD
- 53.55%
- 6M
- 48.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NXTG
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 22.84%
- YTD
- 54.54%
- 6M
- 55.39%
- 1Y
- 82.82%
- 3Y*
- 35.56%
- 5Y*
- 19.17%
- 10Y*
- 17.94%
WQTM vs. NXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 53.55% | -14.56% |
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF | 54.54% | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between WQTM and NXTG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WQTM vs. NXTG — Risk / Return Rank
WQTM
NXTG
WQTM vs. NXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WQTM | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 0.69 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
WQTM vs. NXTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WQTM drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum NXTG drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQTM and NXTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WQTM | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -33.61% | +7.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.80% | -0.82% | -2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.75% | -7.87% | -3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.62% | — |
Volatility
WQTM vs. NXTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WQTM | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.98% | 18.44% | +23.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.98% | 17.93% | +24.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.98% | 18.88% | +23.10% |
WQTM vs. NXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
WQTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than NXTG's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
WQTM vs. NXTG - Dividend Comparison
WQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF | 1.11% | 1.56% | 1.51% | 2.15% | 2.04% | 1.97% | 1.04% | 0.77% | 1.27% | 1.65% | 1.23% | 1.11% |
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WQTM and NXTG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WQTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WQTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NXTG.
NXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.00% for WQTM.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WQTM and 0.70% for NXTG.
Find the right allocation for WQTM and NXTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer