WQTM vs. FBGRX
WQTM (WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both funds - WQTM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WQTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.
Performance
WQTM vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WQTM achieves a 53.55% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's 18.56% return.
WQTM
- 1D
- -3.80%
- 1M
- 23.76%
- YTD
- 53.55%
- 6M
- 48.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBGRX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 9.10%
- YTD
- 18.56%
- 6M
- 19.76%
- 1Y
- 44.98%
- 3Y*
- 32.54%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 21.88%
WQTM vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 53.55% | -14.56% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 18.56% | 2.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between WQTM and FBGRX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WQTM vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
WQTM
FBGRX
WQTM vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WQTM | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 0.68 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
WQTM vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WQTM drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQTM and FBGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WQTM | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -58.64% | +32.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.80% | 0.00% | -3.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.75% | -12.53% | +0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.98% | — |
Volatility
WQTM vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WQTM | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.98% | 17.44% | +24.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.98% | 24.88% | +17.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.98% | 23.69% | +18.29% |
WQTM vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WQTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
WQTM vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
WQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 1.60% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WQTM and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for WQTM and FBGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer