WQTM vs. CHPS
WQTM (WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WQTM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. WQTM is actively managed, while CHPS is passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WQTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
WQTM vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WQTM achieves a 53.55% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.
WQTM
- 1D
- -3.80%
- 1M
- 23.76%
- YTD
- 53.55%
- 6M
- 48.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 32.32%
- YTD
- 107.97%
- 6M
- 109.04%
- 1Y
- 223.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WQTM vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 53.55% | -14.56% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 107.97% | 11.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between WQTM and CHPS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WQTM vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
WQTM
CHPS
WQTM vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WQTM | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 6.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 1.81 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
WQTM vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WQTM drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQTM and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WQTM | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -39.44% | +13.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.80% | 0.00% | -3.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.75% | -9.16% | -2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.50% | — |
Volatility
WQTM vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WQTM | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.98% | 34.43% | +7.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.98% | 33.78% | +8.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.98% | 33.78% | +8.20% |
WQTM vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WQTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
WQTM vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
WQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.32% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% |
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WQTM and CHPS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WQTM.
CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for WQTM.
WQTM is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WQTM and 0.15% for CHPS.
Find the right allocation for WQTM and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer