WPSGX vs. APGZX
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Concentrated Growth Fund (WPSGX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX).
WPSGX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Feb 28, 1994. APGZX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jul 1, 2015.
Performance
WPSGX vs. APGZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WPSGX vs. APGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WPSGX AB Concentrated Growth Fund | -12.47% | 6.29% | 11.16% | 19.70% | -24.61% | 31.53% | 21.22% | 44.50% | 1.56% | 22.99% |
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z | -12.76% | 13.26% | 25.47% | 35.12% | -28.74% | 29.00% | 34.47% | 34.24% | 2.30% | 31.81% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WPSGX having a -12.47% return and APGZX slightly lower at -12.76%. Over the past 10 years, WPSGX has underperformed APGZX with an annualized return of 11.12%, while APGZX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.52% annualized return.
WPSGX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -9.49%
- YTD
- -12.47%
- 6M
- -13.93%
- 1Y
- -2.88%
- 3Y*
- 5.90%
- 5Y*
- 2.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
APGZX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -10.09%
- YTD
- -12.76%
- 6M
- -12.55%
- 1Y
- 7.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 14.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WPSGX vs. APGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WPSGX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than APGZX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WPSGX vs. APGZX — Risk / Return Rank
WPSGX
APGZX
WPSGX vs. APGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Concentrated Growth Fund (WPSGX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WPSGX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | 0.40 | -0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | 0.73 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.10 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 0.34 | -0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 1.34 | -2.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WPSGX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | 0.40 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.44 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.74 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.73 | -0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between WPSGX and APGZX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WPSGX vs. APGZX - Dividend Comparison
WPSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.73%, less than APGZX's 11.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WPSGX AB Concentrated Growth Fund | 9.73% | 8.52% | 11.43% | 1.15% | 1.95% | 10.55% | 3.56% | 6.53% | 8.08% | 3.51% | 0.44% | 2.89% |
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z | 11.19% | 9.77% | 6.62% | 1.69% | 0.87% | 7.19% | 2.60% | 3.49% | 9.11% | 3.78% | 2.72% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WPSGX vs. APGZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WPSGX drawdown since its inception was -90.28%, which is greater than APGZX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPSGX and APGZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WPSGX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.28% | -33.87% | -56.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.52% | -15.21% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | -33.87% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.22% | -33.87% | -2.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.34% | -15.21% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.86% | -6.08% | -30.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 3.90% | +0.55% |
Volatility
WPSGX vs. APGZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Concentrated Growth Fund (WPSGX) is 4.60%, while AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that WPSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WPSGX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 5.13% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 10.81% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.19% | 19.91% | -1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 20.12% | -2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 19.60% | -0.12% |