PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WPSGX vs. APGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WPSGX vs. APGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Concentrated Growth Fund (WPSGX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WPSGX achieves a -5.20% return, which is significantly lower than APGAX's 5.59% return. Over the past 10 years, WPSGX has underperformed APGAX with an annualized return of 12.12%, while APGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.31% annualized return.


WPSGX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
-5.20%
6M
-4.85%
1Y
-2.00%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*
12.12%

APGAX

1D
-0.63%
1M
3.66%
YTD
5.59%
6M
4.68%
1Y
16.23%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
16.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPSGX vs. APGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WPSGX
AB Concentrated Growth Fund
-5.20%6.29%11.16%19.70%-24.61%31.53%21.22%44.50%1.56%22.99%
APGAX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
5.59%12.96%25.09%34.66%-28.96%28.60%34.05%33.77%1.97%31.36%

Correlation

The correlation between WPSGX and APGAX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 1994

0.86

The correlation between WPSGX and APGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WPSGX vs. APGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPSGX
WPSGX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
WPSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
WPSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

APGAX
APGAX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
APGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
APGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
APGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
APGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPSGX vs. APGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Concentrated Growth Fund (WPSGX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WPSGXAPGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.22

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

1.12

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.28

4.13

-4.40

WPSGX vs. APGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WPSGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the APGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPSGX and APGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WPSGXAPGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

1.19

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.56

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.83

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.54

-0.36

Drawdowns

WPSGX vs. APGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPSGX drawdown since its inception was -90.28%, which is greater than APGAX's maximum drawdown of -67.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPSGX and APGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WPSGXAPGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.28%

-67.19%

-23.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.52%

-15.33%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.66%

-21.63%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.60%

-34.04%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.22%

-34.04%

-2.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.31%

-0.63%

-7.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.70%

-19.42%

-17.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

4.14%

+1.53%

Volatility

WPSGX vs. APGAX - Volatility Comparison

AB Concentrated Growth Fund (WPSGX) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) at 3.20%. This indicates that WPSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WPSGXAPGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

3.20%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

10.91%

-0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.32%

14.36%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.09%

20.16%

-2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.50%

19.67%

-0.17%

WPSGX vs. APGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WPSGX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than APGAX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

WPSGX vs. APGAX - Dividend Comparison

WPSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.98%, less than APGAX's 10.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APGAX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
10.71%11.31%7.44%1.75%0.97%8.04%2.87%3.66%9.96%4.09%2.74%9.23%
WPSGX
AB Concentrated Growth Fund
8.98%8.52%11.43%1.15%1.95%10.55%3.56%6.53%8.08%3.51%0.44%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


WPSGX and APGAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WPSGX has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to APGAX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WPSGX dropped -90.28% vs APGAX's -67.19%.

APGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WPSGX and APGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer