APGAX vs. TPLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX).
APGAX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Oct 1, 1996. TPLGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 30, 2003.
Performance
APGAX vs. TPLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
APGAX vs. TPLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APGAX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A | -12.84% | 12.96% | 25.09% | 34.66% | -28.96% | 28.60% | 34.05% | 33.77% | 1.97% | 31.36% |
TPLGX T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund | -14.47% | 18.66% | 35.22% | 49.63% | -38.49% | 17.84% | 34.70% | 30.15% | 2.18% | 36.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APGAX achieves a -12.84% return, which is significantly higher than TPLGX's -14.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with APGAX having a 14.15% annualized return and TPLGX not far ahead at 14.45%.
APGAX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -10.13%
- YTD
- -12.84%
- 6M
- -12.69%
- 1Y
- 7.50%
- 3Y*
- 14.10%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
TPLGX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -8.80%
- YTD
- -14.47%
- 6M
- -12.97%
- 1Y
- 11.57%
- 3Y*
- 20.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 14.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
APGAX vs. TPLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
APGAX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than TPLGX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
APGAX vs. TPLGX — Risk / Return Rank
APGAX
TPLGX
APGAX vs. TPLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APGAX | TPLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 0.52 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.71 | 0.92 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.13 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | 0.51 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.26 | 1.78 | -0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APGAX | TPLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 0.52 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.34 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.64 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.52 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between APGAX and TPLGX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
APGAX vs. TPLGX - Dividend Comparison
APGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.98%, less than TPLGX's 23.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APGAX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A | 12.98% | 11.31% | 7.44% | 1.75% | 0.97% | 8.04% | 2.87% | 3.66% | 9.96% | 4.09% | 2.74% | 9.23% |
TPLGX T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund | 23.73% | 20.30% | 12.87% | 3.70% | 4.39% | 8.81% | 0.59% | 0.60% | 1.65% | 1.39% | 0.25% | 0.44% |
Drawdowns
APGAX vs. TPLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APGAX drawdown since its inception was -67.19%, which is greater than TPLGX's maximum drawdown of -54.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APGAX and TPLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| APGAX | TPLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.19% | -54.57% | -12.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.33% | -17.15% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.04% | -43.45% | +9.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.04% | -43.45% | +9.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.33% | -17.15% | +1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.51% | -8.71% | -10.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 4.88% | -0.94% |
Volatility
APGAX vs. TPLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) is 5.12%, while T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that APGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| APGAX | TPLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 5.55% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.80% | 11.76% | -0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.92% | 22.38% | -2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 24.27% | -4.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.60% | 22.84% | -3.24% |