WPS vs. SCHH
WPS (iShares International Developed Property ETF) and SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - WPS tracks the S&P Developed ex US Property Index while SCHH tracks the Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WPS charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SCHH.
Performance
WPS vs. SCHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WPS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHH
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 11.08%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 12.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.95%
- 10Y*
- 4.02%
WPS vs. SCHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WPS iShares International Developed Property ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -3.59% | 7.43% | -24.74% | 9.05% | -5.36% | 20.34% | -9.03% | 22.86% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 11.08% | 2.20% | 4.99% | 11.18% | -24.99% | 41.07% | -14.81% | 22.85% | -4.26% | 3.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between WPS and SCHH is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2011 | 0.54 |
The correlation between WPS and SCHH shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WPS vs. SCHH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WPS
SCHH
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
WPS
SCHH
Basic Materials
WPS
-
SCHH
Communication Services
WPS
-
SCHH
-
Consumer Cyclical
WPS
-
SCHH
-
Consumer Defensive
WPS
-
SCHH
-
Energy
WPS
-
SCHH
-
Financial Services
WPS
-
SCHH
Healthcare
WPS
-
SCHH
-
Industrials
WPS
-
SCHH
-
Technology
WPS
-
SCHH
-
Utilities
WPS
-
SCHH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WPS vs. SCHH — Risk / Return Rank
WPS
SCHH
WPS vs. SCHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Property ETF (WPS) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WPS | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.34 | — |
Drawdowns
WPS vs. SCHH - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WPS | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -44.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -3.19% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -9.45% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.62% | — |
Volatility
WPS vs. SCHH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WPS | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 13.17% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 18.70% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 20.97% | — |
WPS vs. SCHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
WPS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHH's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
WPS vs. SCHH - Dividend Comparison
WPS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 2.82% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% |
WPS iShares International Developed Property ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.48% | 2.38% | 2.63% | 4.36% | 2.31% | 6.81% | 4.45% | 4.31% | 5.73% | 3.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WPS and SCHH have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for WPS.
SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.00% for WPS.
WPS tracks S&P Developed ex US Property Index, while SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for WPS and 0.07% for SCHH.
Find the right allocation for WPS and SCHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer