PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WPOPX vs. NLSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WPOPX vs. NLSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Weitz Partners III Opportunity Fund (WPOPX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WPOPX achieves a -3.01% return, which is significantly lower than NLSIX's 2.34% return. Over the past 10 years, WPOPX has underperformed NLSIX with an annualized return of 6.03%, while NLSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.86% annualized return.


WPOPX

1D
-1.26%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
-3.01%
6M
-2.96%
1Y
0.27%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
1.45%
10Y*
6.03%

NLSIX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.64%
YTD
2.34%
6M
1.99%
1Y
6.09%
3Y*
7.70%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*
6.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPOPX vs. NLSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WPOPX
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Fund
-3.01%3.23%16.32%17.35%-22.53%12.55%9.45%34.24%-5.26%5.48%
NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund
2.34%7.20%7.47%13.10%-6.85%9.01%15.27%17.11%-6.92%13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between WPOPX and NLSIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2011

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between WPOPX and NLSIX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WPOPX vs. NLSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPOPX
WPOPX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
WPOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
WPOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

NLSIX
NLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPOPX vs. NLSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weitz Partners III Opportunity Fund (WPOPX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WPOPXNLSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.23

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

1.41

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.10

5.44

-5.34

WPOPX vs. NLSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WPOPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the NLSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPOPX and NLSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WPOPXNLSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

1.26

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.86

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.94

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.96

-0.55

Drawdowns

WPOPX vs. NLSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPOPX drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than NLSIX's maximum drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPOPX and NLSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WPOPXNLSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.70%

-14.75%

-40.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.44%

-4.39%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.79%

-6.90%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.73%

-10.79%

-17.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.73%

-14.75%

-13.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.28%

-0.58%

-4.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.35%

-2.02%

-6.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

1.13%

+3.02%

Volatility

WPOPX vs. NLSIX - Volatility Comparison

Weitz Partners III Opportunity Fund (WPOPX) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) at 1.42%. This indicates that WPOPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WPOPXNLSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

1.42%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

3.93%

+4.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

4.91%

+7.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

6.66%

+9.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.97%

7.32%

+8.65%

WPOPX vs. NLSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WPOPX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than NLSIX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

WPOPX vs. NLSIX - Dividend Comparison

WPOPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, more than NLSIX's 0.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund
0.05%0.05%0.02%0.97%7.01%1.13%2.15%2.39%5.91%0.00%0.00%0.01%
WPOPX
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Fund
5.80%5.62%7.04%6.85%8.47%11.86%12.50%6.51%7.99%4.65%1.35%13.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


WPOPX and NLSIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WPOPX has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to NLSIX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WPOPX dropped -55.70% vs NLSIX's -14.75%.

NLSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WPOPX and NLSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer