PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WPM vs. ZVRA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WPM vs. ZVRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) and Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WPM achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than ZVRA's 41.18% return. Over the past 10 years, WPM has outperformed ZVRA with an annualized return of 20.59%, while ZVRA has yielded a comparatively lower -16.40% annualized return.


WPM

1D
3.05%
1M
-18.24%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
-0.91%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
38.53%
5Y*
20.71%
10Y*
20.59%

ZVRA

1D
-2.47%
1M
13.76%
YTD
41.18%
6M
51.86%
1Y
35.01%
3Y*
29.54%
5Y*
-2.85%
10Y*
-16.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPM vs. ZVRA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
-0.90%110.52%15.24%27.91%-7.53%4.22%41.82%54.62%-10.04%16.41%
ZVRA
Zevra Therapeutics Inc.
41.18%7.43%27.33%42.70%-47.30%-22.23%84.70%-78.71%-56.05%37.29%

Correlation

The correlation between WPM and ZVRA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WPM:

$52.82B

ZVRA:

$761.92M

EPS

WPM:

$3.96

ZVRA:

$2.16

PE Ratio

WPM:

29.33

ZVRA:

5.85

PS Ratio

WPM:

19.23

ZVRA:

5.94

PB Ratio

WPM:

5.70

ZVRA:

3.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

WPM:

$2.75B

ZVRA:

$122.29M

Gross Profit (TTM)

WPM:

$2.12B

ZVRA:

$104.94M

EBITDA (TTM)

WPM:

$2.38B

ZVRA:

$149.15M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WPM vs. ZVRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPM
WPM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
WPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPM Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
WPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

ZVRA
ZVRA Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ZVRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVRA Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVRA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPM vs. ZVRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) and Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WPMZVRADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.16

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

0.81

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.40

1.41

+0.99

WPM vs. ZVRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WPM Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the ZVRA Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPM and ZVRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WPM vs. ZVRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPM drawdown since its inception was -48.64%, smaller than the maximum ZVRA drawdown of -99.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPM and ZVRA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WPMZVRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.64%

-99.27%

+50.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.92%

-43.47%

+8.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.92%

-43.47%

+8.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.29%

-74.01%

+30.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.64%

-97.85%

+49.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.73%

-96.65%

+66.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.87%

-86.41%

+67.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.22%

24.87%

-12.65%

Volatility

WPM vs. ZVRA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) is 16.76%, while Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA) has a volatility of 24.56%. This indicates that WPM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZVRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WPMZVRADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.76%

24.56%

-7.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.19%

40.23%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.96%

62.90%

-16.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.44%

60.49%

-25.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.78%

81.46%

-44.68%

Dividends

WPM vs. ZVRA - Dividend Comparison

WPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while ZVRA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
0.62%0.56%1.10%1.22%1.54%1.33%1.01%1.21%1.84%1.49%1.09%
ZVRA
Zevra Therapeutics Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

WPM vs. ZVRA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. and Zevra Therapeutics Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
888.98M
36.22M
(WPM) Total Revenue
(ZVRA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


WPM and ZVRA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZVRA has higher volatility (24.56%) compared to WPM (16.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WPM dropped -48.64% vs ZVRA's -99.27%.

WPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WPM and ZVRA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer