WOOD vs. SOXX
WOOD (iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WOOD is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WOOD returned 5.97%/yr vs 36.08%/yr for SOXX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WOOD charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
WOOD vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WOOD achieves a -7.28% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 100.58% return. Over the past 10 years, WOOD has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 5.97%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 36.08% annualized return.
WOOD
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- -7.28%
- 6M
- -6.36%
- 1Y
- -6.77%
- 3Y*
- -0.01%
- 5Y*
- -3.45%
- 10Y*
- 5.97%
SOXX
- 1D
- -7.88%
- 1M
- 12.35%
- YTD
- 100.58%
- 6M
- 98.07%
- 1Y
- 167.63%
- 3Y*
- 56.18%
- 5Y*
- 33.69%
- 10Y*
- 36.08%
WOOD vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF | -7.28% | -3.27% | -4.21% | 13.84% | -19.39% | 17.03% | 20.36% | 19.75% | -17.73% | 34.49% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 100.58% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between WOOD and SOXX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2008 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WOOD and SOXX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
WOOD vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WOOD
SOXX
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
WOOD
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
WOOD
SOXX
-
Real Estate
WOOD
SOXX
-
Communication Services
WOOD
-
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
WOOD
-
SOXX
-
Energy
WOOD
-
SOXX
-
Financial Services
WOOD
-
SOXX
-
Healthcare
WOOD
-
SOXX
-
Industrials
WOOD
-
SOXX
-
Technology
WOOD
-
SOXX
Utilities
WOOD
-
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WOOD vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
WOOD
SOXX
WOOD vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WOOD | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.60 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 10.70 | -11.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 38.46 | -39.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WOOD vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WOOD drawdown since its inception was -63.25%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOOD and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WOOD | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.25% | -70.21% | +6.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.64% | -15.77% | -5.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | -41.36% | +18.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.71% | -45.75% | +15.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.20% | -45.75% | -4.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.58% | -7.88% | -16.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.79% | -19.94% | +5.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.14% | 4.38% | +5.76% |
Volatility
WOOD vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) is 5.12%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 22.75%. This indicates that WOOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WOOD | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 22.75% | -17.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.22% | 33.44% | -19.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.90% | 39.42% | -20.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 37.21% | -17.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 34.00% | -12.24% |
WOOD vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WOOD has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
WOOD vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
WOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than SOXX's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.24% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF | 2.55% | 2.51% | 2.09% | 1.64% | 2.26% | 1.24% | 0.98% | 1.85% | 2.82% | 1.19% | 1.65% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WOOD and SOXX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (22.75%) compared to WOOD (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOOD dropped -63.25% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 36.08% vs 5.97% for WOOD. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, WOOD has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 36.08% return vs 5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for WOOD.
WOOD has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 0.24% for SOXX.
WOOD is categorized as Materials, while SOXX is Semiconductors. WOOD tracks S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for WOOD and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.28 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WOOD and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer