WOMN vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WOMN (Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. WOMN is passively managed, while GRW is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

WOMN vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WOMN

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 3.04%
• YTD: 4.89%
• 6M: 5.52%
• 1Y: 12.46%
• 3Y*: 15.17%
• 5Y*: 8.80%
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOMN vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WOMN Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF	1.30%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between WOMN and GRW is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.60

WOMN vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WOMN	GRW
Technology	30.3%	26.6%
Financial Services	14.3%	9.8%
Healthcare	11.0%	4.1%
Communication Services	9.8%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.9%	-
Industrials	6.8%	38.1%
Energy	6.1%	-
Utilities	3.0%	-
Real Estate	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	4.0%

Return for Risk

WOMN vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOMN

WOMN Risk / Return Rank: 33
WOMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
WOMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
WOMN Omega Ratio Rank: 31
WOMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
WOMN Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOMN vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WOMN	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.90	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WOMN	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	13.58	-12.86

Drawdowns

WOMN vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOMN drawdown since its inception was -32.23%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOMN and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	WOMN	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.23%	-0.45%	-31.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-0.27%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.53%	-0.17%	-5.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WOMN	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.76%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.84%	8.89%	+1.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.16%	8.89%	+7.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.70%	8.89%	+9.81%

WOMN vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WOMN and GRW have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

WOMN vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

WOMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WOMN Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF	0.78%	0.76%	1.08%	1.80%	5.59%	3.10%	6.15%	1.12%	0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WOMN and GRW in my portfolio?

WOMN and GRW have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WOMN or GRW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WOMN or GRW?

WOMN and GRW have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WOMN or GRW?

WOMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between WOMN and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: Impact Shares and TCW.