PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WOMN vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WOMN vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOMN achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return.


WOMN

1D
0.93%
1M
3.04%
YTD
4.89%
6M
5.52%
1Y
12.46%
3Y*
15.17%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*

DBO

1D
-2.66%
1M
-3.39%
YTD
79.84%
6M
74.51%
1Y
77.38%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
15.36%
10Y*
10.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOMN vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WOMN
Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF
4.89%8.62%16.95%28.19%-20.61%24.89%34.16%32.50%-11.94%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
79.84%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-30.82%

Correlation

The correlation between WOMN and DBO is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018

0.17

The correlation between WOMN and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WOMN vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WOMN
DBO

Technology

30.3%

-

Financial Services

14.3%
116.0%

Healthcare

11.0%

-

Communication Services

9.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.9%

-

Industrials

6.8%

-

Energy

6.1%

-

Utilities

3.0%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

WOMN
30.3%
DBO

-

Financial Services

WOMN
14.3%
DBO
116.0%

Healthcare

WOMN
11.0%
DBO

-

Communication Services

WOMN
9.8%
DBO

-

Consumer Cyclical

WOMN
7.6%
DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

WOMN
6.9%
DBO

-

Industrials

WOMN
6.8%
DBO

-

Energy

WOMN
6.1%
DBO

-

Utilities

WOMN
3.0%
DBO

-

Real Estate

WOMN
2.0%
DBO

-

Basic Materials

WOMN
1.8%
DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WOMN vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOMN
WOMN Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
WOMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOMN Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
WOMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOMN Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOMN vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WOMNDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.36

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

4.28

-2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

8.69

-2.79

WOMN vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WOMN Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WOMN and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WOMNDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

2.25

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.48

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.02

+0.70

Drawdowns

WOMN vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOMN drawdown since its inception was -32.23%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOMN and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WOMNDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.23%

-90.18%

+57.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-18.19%

+10.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.34%

-28.20%

+10.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.80%

-37.68%

+11.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-52.68%

+52.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-62.25%

+56.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

8.94%

-6.82%

Volatility

WOMN vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) is 2.76%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that WOMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WOMNDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

12.79%

-10.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

28.32%

-20.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.84%

34.58%

-23.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.16%

32.31%

-16.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.70%

31.79%

-13.09%

WOMN vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

WOMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

WOMN vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

WOMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than DBO's 1.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.95%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
WOMN
Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF
0.78%0.76%1.08%1.80%5.59%3.10%6.15%1.12%0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


WOMN and DBO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to WOMN (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOMN dropped -32.23% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.36% vs 8.80% for WOMN. On fees, WOMN is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, WOMN has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.36% return vs 8.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WOMN is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.78% for WOMN.

WOMN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. WOMN tracks Morningstar Women’s Empowerment Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Impact Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WOMN and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WOMN and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer