WOBDX vs. CLDAX
WOBDX (JPMorgan Core Bond Fund) and CLDAX (Calvert Core Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, WOBDX returned 1.68%/yr vs 2.52%/yr for CLDAX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. WOBDX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for CLDAX.
Performance
WOBDX vs. CLDAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WOBDX achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly higher than CLDAX's -1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, WOBDX has underperformed CLDAX with an annualized return of 1.68%, while CLDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.52% annualized return.
WOBDX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 1Y
- 1.74%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- -0.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.80%
CLDAX
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- 6M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- -1.36%
- 1Y
- 1.08%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- -0.77%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.31%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
WOBDX vs. CLDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WOBDX JPMorgan Core Bond Fund | -0.61% | 7.38% | 1.97% | 5.79% | -12.35% | -1.11% | 8.13% | 8.34% | 0.20% | 3.81% |
CLDAX Calvert Core Bond Fund | -1.36% | 7.27% | 1.39% | 5.04% | -13.48% | -2.30% | 14.56% | 20.77% | -5.73% | 9.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between WOBDX and CLDAX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2005 | 0.89 |
The correlation between WOBDX and CLDAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WOBDX vs. CLDAX — Risk / Return Rank
WOBDX
CLDAX
WOBDX vs. CLDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (WOBDX) and Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WOBDX | CLDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.09 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 0.59 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.13 | 1.48 | +0.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WOBDX vs. CLDAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WOBDX drawdown since its inception was -16.65%, smaller than the maximum CLDAX drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOBDX and CLDAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WOBDX | CLDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.65% | -18.88% | +2.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -3.24% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.77% | -5.21% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.59% | -18.21% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.65% | -18.88% | +2.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -4.74% | +2.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.90% | -3.91% | +2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.24% | 1.29% | -0.05% |
Volatility
WOBDX vs. CLDAX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (WOBDX) and Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX) have volatilities of 0.95% and 0.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WOBDX | CLDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.95% | 0.97% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 3.14% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | 3.87% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.71% | 5.66% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.71% | 6.76% | -2.05% |
WOBDX vs. CLDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WOBDX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CLDAX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
WOBDX vs. CLDAX - Dividend Comparison
WOBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than CLDAX's 3.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDAX Calvert Core Bond Fund | 3.93% | 4.24% | 4.16% | 3.17% | 1.80% | 6.08% | 5.22% | 3.04% | 3.63% | 3.02% | 7.02% | 2.85% |
WOBDX JPMorgan Core Bond Fund | 4.18% | 3.97% | 3.95% | 3.51% | 2.68% | 2.82% | 4.00% | 3.23% | 2.91% | 2.88% | 2.84% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, WOBDX and CLDAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CLDAX has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to WOBDX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOBDX dropped -16.65% vs CLDAX's -18.88%.
WOBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WOBDX and CLDAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer