PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WNTR vs. XRMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WNTR vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WNTR vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WNTR achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly higher than XRMI's -2.52% return.


WNTR

1D
-1.97%
1M
1.75%
YTD
6.27%
6M
79.41%
1Y
54.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XRMI

1D
0.81%
1M
-4.04%
YTD
-2.52%
6M
1.58%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
6.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WNTR vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

WNTR has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WNTR vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

XRMI
XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WNTR vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WNTRXRMIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

0.52

+0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.55

0.76

+0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.11

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

0.79

+0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.42

2.73

-0.31

WNTR vs. XRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WNTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the XRMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WNTR and XRMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WNTRXRMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

0.52

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

0.24

+0.99

Correlation

The correlation between WNTR and XRMI is -0.34. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

WNTR vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.37%, more than XRMI's 12.83% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
88.37%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.83%12.35%11.86%12.62%12.84%2.93%

Drawdowns

WNTR vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WNTR drawdown since its inception was -38.59%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNTR and XRMI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WNTRXRMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.59%

-15.31%

-23.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.59%

-5.02%

-33.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.30%

-4.25%

-9.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.16%

-6.10%

-13.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.60%

1.45%

+21.15%

Volatility

WNTR vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a higher volatility of 15.22% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 2.62%. This indicates that WNTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WNTRXRMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.22%

2.62%

+12.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.38%

4.50%

+36.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.65%

6.88%

+44.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.88%

6.99%

+44.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.88%

6.99%

+44.89%