WNRG.L vs. DH2O.L
WNRG.L (State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and DH2O.L (iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Global Equities funds - WNRG.L tracks the MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index while DH2O.L tracks the S&P Global Water Index (NET) (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WNRG.L returned 9.57%/yr vs 9.58%/yr for DH2O.L. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WNRG.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DH2O.L.
Performance
WNRG.L vs. DH2O.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WNRG.L achieves a 33.08% return, which is significantly higher than DH2O.L's 2.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WNRG.L having a 9.57% annualized return and DH2O.L not far ahead at 9.58%.
WNRG.L
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 12.04%
- 6M
- 23.49%
- YTD
- 33.08%
- 1Y
- 41.93%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 22.07%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.16%
DH2O.L
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 5.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.09M | $621.54K | $404.44K | |
| $818.45K | $970.99K | $1.09M |
WNRG.L vs. DH2O.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNRG.L State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 33.08% | 14.83% | 2.07% | 3.52% | 46.61% | 38.74% | -30.35% | 9.89% | -14.99% | 4.80% |
DH2O.L iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.61% | 17.60% | 4.29% | 13.57% | -20.83% | 30.67% | 15.22% | 33.60% | -10.59% | 27.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between WNRG.L and DH2O.L is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2009 | 0.50 |
The correlation between WNRG.L and DH2O.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WNRG.L vs. DH2O.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WNRG.L
DH2O.L
Energy
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
WNRG.L
DH2O.L
Communication Services
WNRG.L
DH2O.L
-
Basic Materials
WNRG.L
-
DH2O.L
Consumer Cyclical
WNRG.L
-
DH2O.L
Consumer Defensive
WNRG.L
-
DH2O.L
-
Financial Services
WNRG.L
-
DH2O.L
-
Healthcare
WNRG.L
-
DH2O.L
-
Industrials
WNRG.L
-
DH2O.L
Real Estate
WNRG.L
-
DH2O.L
Technology
WNRG.L
-
DH2O.L
Utilities
WNRG.L
-
DH2O.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WNRG.L vs. DH2O.L — Risk / Return Rank
WNRG.L
DH2O.L
WNRG.L vs. DH2O.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) and iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WNRG.L | DH2O.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.07 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 0.51 | +2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.33 | 1.15 | +6.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WNRG.L vs. DH2O.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WNRG.L drawdown since its inception was -68.72%, which is greater than DH2O.L's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNRG.L and DH2O.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WNRG.L | DH2O.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.72% | -56.90% | -11.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.98% | -10.53% | -5.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.94% | -15.81% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.55% | -32.43% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.92% | -35.56% | -28.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.35% | -5.25% | +0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.53% | -10.39% | -7.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.63% | 4.65% | +0.98% |
Volatility
WNRG.L vs. DH2O.L - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L) at 4.50%. This indicates that WNRG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DH2O.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WNRG.L | DH2O.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | 4.50% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.90% | 11.08% | +6.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.72% | 13.81% | +6.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.19% | 16.76% | +7.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.36% | 16.50% | +16.86% |
WNRG.L vs. DH2O.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WNRG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DH2O.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
WNRG.L vs. DH2O.L - Dividend Comparison
WNRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DH2O.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DH2O.L iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.06% | 1.18% | 1.09% | 1.66% | 0.94% | 1.39% | 1.80% | 1.46% | 1.76% | 1.65% |
WNRG.L State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WNRG.L and DH2O.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WNRG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WNRG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DH2O.L.
WNRG.L tracks MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index, while DH2O.L tracks S&P Global Water Index (NET) (USD). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WNRG.L and 0.65% for DH2O.L.
Find the right allocation for WNRG.L and DH2O.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer