PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WNRG.L vs. FSWD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

WNRG.L vs. FSWD.L

Last updated Jul 26, 2026
Documentation

WNRG.L (State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and FSWD.L (iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - WNRG.L tracks the MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index while FSWD.L tracks the STOXX Developed World Equity Factor Screened Net Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WNRG.L returned 9.57%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for FSWD.L. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.

Performance

WNRG.L vs. FSWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) and iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WNRG.L is traded in USD, while FSWD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FSWD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WNRG.L achieves a 33.08% return, which is significantly higher than FSWD.L's 12.45% return. Over the past 10 years, WNRG.L has underperformed FSWD.L with an annualized return of 9.57%, while FSWD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.70% annualized return.

WNRG.L

1D
-0.73%
1M
12.04%
6M
23.49%
YTD
33.08%
1Y
41.93%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
22.07%
10Y*
9.57%
ALL TIME*
7.16%

FSWD.L

1D
0.82%
1M
2.35%
6M
12.01%
YTD
12.45%
1Y
22.70%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
11.70%
ALL TIME*
7.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

FSWD.L

iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
$170.32K$254.19K$268.71K

WNRG.L

State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
$818.45K$970.99K$1.09M

WNRG.L vs. FSWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WNRG.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		33.08%14.83%2.07%3.52%46.61%38.74%-30.35%9.89%-14.99%4.80%
FSWD.L
iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		12.45%26.00%16.89%14.80%-15.51%21.00%10.16%22.35%-12.59%26.17%

Correlation

The correlation between WNRG.L and FSWD.L is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2015

0.46

The correlation between WNRG.L and FSWD.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WNRG.L vs. FSWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
WNRG.L
FSWD.L

Energy

99.9%
3.8%

Communication Services

0.1%
8.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.7%

Financial Services

-

19.4%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Industrials

-

8.0%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

-

30.9%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Energy

WNRG.L
99.9%
FSWD.L
3.8%

Communication Services

WNRG.L
0.1%
FSWD.L
8.7%

Basic Materials

WNRG.L

-

FSWD.L
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

WNRG.L

-

FSWD.L
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

WNRG.L

-

FSWD.L
5.7%

Financial Services

WNRG.L

-

FSWD.L
19.4%

Healthcare

WNRG.L

-

FSWD.L
8.4%

Industrials

WNRG.L

-

FSWD.L
8.0%

Real Estate

WNRG.L

-

FSWD.L
1.0%

Technology

WNRG.L

-

FSWD.L
30.9%

Utilities

WNRG.L

-

FSWD.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with WNRG.L:
WNRG.L vs. JGEP.LWNRG.L vs. HKOD.LWNRG.L vs. DH2O.LWNRG.L vs. HDGB.LWNRG.L vs. G500.LWNRG.L vs. SPXS.LWNRG.L vs. LGUS.L
Often compared with FSWD.L:
FSWD.L vs. IDIN.LFSWD.L vs. SASU.LFSWD.L vs. VRPS.LFSWD.L vs. ISUS.LFSWD.L vs. LGUS.LFSWD.L vs. HDGB.LFSWD.L vs. EEDS.L

Return for Risk

WNRG.L vs. FSWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WNRG.L
WNRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
FSWD.L
FSWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FSWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FSWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WNRG.L vs. FSWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) and iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

WNRG.LFSWD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.99
1.86

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.51
2.77

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

2.85

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.33

11.71

-4.38

WNRG.L vs. FSWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the FSWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WNRG.L and FSWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WNRG.L vs. FSWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WNRG.L drawdown since its inception was -68.72%, which is greater than FSWD.L's maximum drawdown of -41.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNRG.L and FSWD.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

WNRG.LFSWD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.72%

-41.16%

-27.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.98%

-7.98%

-8.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.94%

-18.85%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.55%

-25.01%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.92%

-34.31%

-29.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.35%

-0.92%

-3.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.53%

-12.25%

-5.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

1.94%

+3.69%

Volatility

WNRG.L vs. FSWD.L - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L) at 3.30%. This indicates that WNRG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

WNRG.LFSWD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

3.30%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.90%

9.70%

+8.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.72%

12.18%

+8.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.19%

20.19%

+4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.36%

18.37%

+14.99%

WNRG.L vs. FSWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WNRG.L and FSWD.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.

Dividends

WNRG.L vs. FSWD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WNRG.L nor FSWD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

WNRG.L and FSWD.L have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WNRG.L and FSWD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

WNRG.L tracks MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index, while FSWD.L tracks STOXX Developed World Equity Factor Screened Net Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WNRG.L and FSWD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer