WNRG.L vs. JGEP.L
WNRG.L (State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and JGEP.L (JPM Global Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds. WNRG.L is passively managed, while JGEP.L is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, WNRG.L returned 16.62%/yr vs 19.36%/yr for JGEP.L. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WNRG.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JGEP.L.
Performance
WNRG.L vs. JGEP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WNRG.L is traded in USD, while JGEP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JGEP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WNRG.L achieves a 33.08% return, which is significantly higher than JGEP.L's 8.52% return.
WNRG.L
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 12.04%
- 6M
- 23.49%
- YTD
- 33.08%
- 1Y
- 41.93%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 22.07%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.16%
JGEP.L
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 18.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $421.17K | $1.04M | $974.23K | |
| $818.45K | $970.99K | $1.09M |
WNRG.L vs. JGEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNRG.L State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 33.08% | 14.83% | 2.07% | 3.52% | 46.61% | -2.89% |
JGEP.L JPM Global Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | 8.52% | 26.53% | 18.95% | 31.32% | -26.14% | 4.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between WNRG.L and JGEP.L is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.31 |
The correlation between WNRG.L and JGEP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WNRG.L vs. JGEP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WNRG.L
JGEP.L
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
WNRG.L
JGEP.L
Communication Services
WNRG.L
JGEP.L
Basic Materials
WNRG.L
-
JGEP.L
Consumer Cyclical
WNRG.L
-
JGEP.L
Consumer Defensive
WNRG.L
-
JGEP.L
Financial Services
WNRG.L
-
JGEP.L
Healthcare
WNRG.L
-
JGEP.L
Industrials
WNRG.L
-
JGEP.L
Real Estate
WNRG.L
-
JGEP.L
Technology
WNRG.L
-
JGEP.L
Utilities
WNRG.L
-
JGEP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WNRG.L vs. JGEP.L — Risk / Return Rank
WNRG.L
JGEP.L
WNRG.L vs. JGEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) and JPM Global Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (JGEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WNRG.L | JGEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.21 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 1.59 | +0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.33 | 6.23 | +1.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WNRG.L vs. JGEP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WNRG.L drawdown since its inception was -68.72%, which is greater than JGEP.L's maximum drawdown of -37.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNRG.L and JGEP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WNRG.L | JGEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.72% | -37.78% | -30.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.98% | -10.96% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.94% | -17.20% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.35% | -2.46% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.53% | -8.66% | -8.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.63% | 2.79% | +2.84% |
Volatility
WNRG.L vs. JGEP.L - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to JPM Global Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (JGEP.L) at 3.91%. This indicates that WNRG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JGEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WNRG.L | JGEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | 3.91% | +1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.90% | 11.61% | +6.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.72% | 14.67% | +6.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.19% | 20.12% | +4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.36% | 20.12% | +13.24% |
WNRG.L vs. JGEP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WNRG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than JGEP.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
WNRG.L vs. JGEP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WNRG.L nor JGEP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WNRG.L and JGEP.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JGEP.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JGEP.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WNRG.L.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WNRG.L and 0.25% for JGEP.L.
Find the right allocation for WNRG.L and JGEP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer