PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WNDY.L vs. JPLG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WNDY.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNDY.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WNDY.L is traded in USD, while JPLG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JPLG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WNDY.L achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than JPLG.L's 12.50% return.


WNDY.L

1D
-0.62%
1M
-10.14%
6M
-7.15%
YTD
0.09%
1Y
16.74%
3Y*
-1.62%
5Y*
10Y*

JPLG.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.42%
6M
9.64%
YTD
12.50%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WNDY.L vs. JPLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WNDY.L
Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.09%32.58%-20.21%-19.30%-12.05%
JPLG.L
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating
12.50%18.42%10.23%12.69%-7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between WNDY.L and JPLG.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2022

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WNDY.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WNDY.L
WNDY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
WNDY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNDY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNDY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
WNDY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNDY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

JPLG.L
JPLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WNDY.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNDY.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WNDY.LJPLG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.42

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

3.30

-2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.49

12.39

-9.91

WNDY.L vs. JPLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WNDY.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WNDY.L and JPLG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WNDY.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WNDY.L drawdown since its inception was -52.51%, which is greater than JPLG.L's maximum drawdown of -35.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNDY.L and JPLG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WNDY.LJPLG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.51%

-35.38%

-17.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.39%

-6.61%

-15.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.99%

-12.54%

-23.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.90%

0.00%

-29.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.23%

-4.43%

-25.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.72%

1.76%

+4.96%

Volatility

WNDY.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNDY.L) has a higher volatility of 8.14% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) at 1.84%. This indicates that WNDY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WNDY.LJPLG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.14%

1.84%

+6.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.06%

7.09%

+9.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.41%

9.11%

+13.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.08%

13.15%

+9.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.08%

15.73%

+7.35%

WNDY.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WNDY.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

WNDY.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WNDY.L nor JPLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WNDY.L and JPLG.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPLG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPLG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WNDY.L.

WNDY.L tracks Solactive Wind Energy v2 Index, while JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WNDY.L and 0.20% for JPLG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WNDY.L and JPLG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer