PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WNDY.L vs. BUGG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WNDY.L vs. BUGG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Acc (WNDY.L) and Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BUGG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WNDY.L is traded in USD, while BUGG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BUGG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WNDY.L achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than BUGG.L's 35.79% return.


WNDY.L

1D
-0.25%
1M
-8.64%
6M
-5.98%
YTD
1.27%
1Y
16.65%
3Y*
-1.37%
5Y*
10Y*

BUGG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
20.81%
6M
37.76%
YTD
35.79%
1Y
18.72%
3Y*
19.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WNDY.L vs. BUGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WNDY.L
Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Acc
1.27%32.58%-20.21%-19.30%-12.05%
BUGG.L
Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
35.79%-4.71%9.35%43.23%-27.40%

Correlation

The correlation between WNDY.L and BUGG.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2022

0.33

The correlation between WNDY.L and BUGG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WNDY.L vs. BUGG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WNDY.L
WNDY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
WNDY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNDY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNDY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
WNDY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNDY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

BUGG.L
BUGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BUGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BUGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WNDY.L vs. BUGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Acc (WNDY.L) and Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BUGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WNDY.LBUGG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.13

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

0.54

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.59

1.16

+1.42

WNDY.L vs. BUGG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WNDY.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the BUGG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WNDY.L and BUGG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WNDY.L vs. BUGG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WNDY.L drawdown since its inception was -52.51%, smaller than the maximum BUGG.L drawdown of -55.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNDY.L and BUGG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WNDY.LBUGG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.51%

-55.50%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.77%

-34.90%

+13.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.99%

-36.84%

+0.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.07%

-7.57%

-21.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.23%

-36.23%

+6.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.56%

16.15%

-9.59%

Volatility

WNDY.L vs. BUGG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Acc (WNDY.L) is 8.27%, while Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BUGG.L) has a volatility of 10.97%. This indicates that WNDY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WNDY.LBUGG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.27%

10.97%

-2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.03%

28.64%

-11.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.39%

32.07%

-9.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.08%

30.95%

-7.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.08%

30.95%

-7.87%

WNDY.L vs. BUGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WNDY.L and BUGG.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

WNDY.L vs. BUGG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WNDY.L nor BUGG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WNDY.L and BUGG.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WNDY.L and BUGG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

WNDY.L is categorized as Global Equities, while BUGG.L is Technology Equities. WNDY.L tracks Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Acc, while BUGG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WNDY.L and BUGG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer