WNDY.L vs. HKOD.L
WNDY.L (Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Acc) and HKOD.L (HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - WNDY.L tracks the Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Acc while HKOD.L tracks the HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WNDY.L returned -1.37%/yr vs 37.85%/yr for HKOD.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
WNDY.L vs. HKOD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WNDY.L achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than HKOD.L's 70.37% return.
WNDY.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 16.65%
- 3Y*
- -1.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HKOD.L
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- -20.60%
- 6M
- 52.67%
- YTD
- 70.37%
- 1Y
- 138.83%
- 3Y*
- 37.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.71%
- 10Y*
- 14.34%
WNDY.L vs. HKOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNDY.L Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Acc | 1.27% | 32.58% | -20.21% | -19.30% | -12.05% |
HKOD.L HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF | 70.37% | 99.54% | -22.90% | 19.95% | -22.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between WNDY.L and HKOD.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2022 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WNDY.L vs. HKOD.L — Risk / Return Rank
WNDY.L
HKOD.L
WNDY.L vs. HKOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Acc (WNDY.L) and HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WNDY.L | HKOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.45 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 5.77 | -5.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.59 | 17.93 | -15.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WNDY.L vs. HKOD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WNDY.L drawdown since its inception was -52.51%, roughly equal to the maximum HKOD.L drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNDY.L and HKOD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WNDY.L | HKOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.51% | -50.54% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.77% | -24.00% | +2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.99% | -29.48% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.07% | -24.00% | -5.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.23% | -18.79% | -11.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.56% | 7.75% | -1.19% |
Volatility
WNDY.L vs. HKOD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Acc (WNDY.L) is 8.27%, while HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L) has a volatility of 20.20%. This indicates that WNDY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HKOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WNDY.L | HKOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.27% | 20.20% | -11.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.03% | 41.23% | -24.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.39% | 45.10% | -22.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 29.74% | -6.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 26.96% | -3.88% |
WNDY.L vs. HKOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WNDY.L and HKOD.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
WNDY.L vs. HKOD.L - Dividend Comparison
WNDY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HKOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HKOD.L HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF | 0.43% | 0.68% | 1.54% | 1.08% | 0.72% | 0.61% | 0.02% | 0.29% | 0.56% | 0.10% |
WNDY.L Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WNDY.L and HKOD.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WNDY.L and HKOD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
WNDY.L tracks Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Acc, while HKOD.L tracks HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Global X and HSBC.
Find the right allocation for WNDY.L and HKOD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer