PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
JPLG.L vs. AVUV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


JPLG.LAVUV
YTD Return15.06%15.62%
1Y Return20.85%30.84%
3Y Return (Ann)7.93%9.03%
5Y Return (Ann)9.66%16.16%
Sharpe Ratio2.481.72
Sortino Ratio3.582.55
Omega Ratio1.451.31
Calmar Ratio5.513.41
Martin Ratio16.109.00
Ulcer Index1.27%4.16%
Daily Std Dev8.22%21.77%
Max Drawdown-27.53%-49.42%
Current Drawdown0.00%-2.19%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between JPLG.L and AVUV is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

JPLG.L vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JPLG.L having a 15.06% return and AVUV slightly higher at 15.62%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.20%
10.92%
JPLG.L
AVUV

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JPLG.L vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPLG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


AVUV
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
Expense ratio chart for AVUV: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for JPLG.L: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

JPLG.L vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) and Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPLG.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for JPLG.L, currently valued at 2.43, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.43
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for JPLG.L, currently valued at 3.43, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.43
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for JPLG.L, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.44
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for JPLG.L, currently valued at 4.50, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.50
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for JPLG.L, currently valued at 15.43, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0015.43
AVUV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AVUV, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.49
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AVUV, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.23
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AVUV, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AVUV, currently valued at 2.86, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.86
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AVUV, currently valued at 7.47, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.007.47

JPLG.L vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPLG.L and AVUV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.43
1.49
JPLG.L
AVUV

Dividends

JPLG.L vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

JPLG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%.


TTM20232022202120202019
JPLG.L
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AVUV
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
1.52%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%

Drawdowns

JPLG.L vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPLG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.53%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPLG.L and AVUV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.72%
-2.19%
JPLG.L
AVUV

Volatility

JPLG.L vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) is 2.21%, while Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) has a volatility of 8.78%. This indicates that JPLG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.21%
8.78%
JPLG.L
AVUV