WMTI vs. IPDP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WMTI (REX WMT Growth & Income ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. WMTI charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.

Performance

WMTI vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WMTI

• 1D: 4.18%
• 1M: -10.43%
• YTD: 2.10%
• 6M: -0.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPDP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMTI vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF	-10.00%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

WMTI vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WMTI	IPDP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	—	—

Drawdowns

WMTI vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMTI drawdown since its inception was -17.24%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMTI and IPDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	WMTI	IPDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.24%	0.00%	-17.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.78%	0.00%	-13.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.77%	0.00%	-3.77%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WMTI	IPDP	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.30%	0.00%	+28.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.30%	0.00%	+28.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.30%	0.00%	+28.30%

WMTI vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMTI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

WMTI vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

WMTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.32%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%	0.00%
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF	21.32%	3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, WMTI or IPDP?

On fees, WMTI is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WMTI or IPDP?

WMTI is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WMTI or IPDP?

WMTI has the higher dividend yield at 21.32%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between WMTI and IPDP?

They also come from different issuers: REX and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for WMTI and 1.52% for IPDP.