WMTI vs. HYGW
WMTI (REX WMT Growth & Income ETF) and HYGW (iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. WMTI is actively managed, while HYGW is passively managed. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. WMTI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for HYGW.
Performance
WMTI vs. HYGW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMTI achieves a -4.04% return, which is significantly lower than HYGW's 2.36% return.
WMTI
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- 6M
- -9.07%
- YTD
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
HYGW
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 5.90%
- 3Y*
- 5.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $480.97K | $636.40K | $814.79K | |
| $616.62K | $528.80K | $959.03K |
WMTI vs. HYGW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | -4.04% | 9.99% |
HYGW iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 2.36% | 1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMTI and HYGW is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMTI vs. HYGW — Risk / Return Rank
WMTI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HYGW
WMTI vs. HYGW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMTI | HYGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.26 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMTI vs. HYGW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMTI drawdown since its inception was -21.47%, which is greater than HYGW's maximum drawdown of -5.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMTI and HYGW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMTI | HYGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.47% | -5.49% | -15.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.97% | -0.21% | -18.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -0.59% | -5.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.41% | — |
Volatility
WMTI vs. HYGW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMTI | HYGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.52% | 2.92% | +24.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.52% | 4.62% | +22.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.52% | 4.62% | +22.90% |
WMTI vs. HYGW - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMTI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than HYGW's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMTI vs. HYGW - Dividend Comparison
WMTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.84%, more than HYGW's 10.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGW iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 10.71% | 12.53% | 12.30% | 15.98% | 8.71% |
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | 28.84% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMTI and HYGW have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYGW is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYGW is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for WMTI.
WMTI has the higher dividend yield at 28.84%, compared with 10.71% for HYGW.
They also come from different issuers: REX and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for WMTI and 0.69% for HYGW.
Find the right allocation for WMTI and HYGW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer