PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMICX vs. HRSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMICX vs. HRSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Micro Cap Fund (WMICX) and Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund (HRSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMICX achieves a 18.80% return, which is significantly lower than HRSMX's 32.91% return. Over the past 10 years, WMICX has underperformed HRSMX with an annualized return of 14.40%, while HRSMX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.91% annualized return.


WMICX

1D
0.98%
1M
3.21%
6M
12.57%
YTD
18.80%
1Y
32.56%
3Y*
16.23%
5Y*
0.32%
10Y*
14.40%

HRSMX

1D
1.87%
1M
-1.18%
6M
19.94%
YTD
32.91%
1Y
68.60%
3Y*
33.31%
5Y*
15.37%
10Y*
19.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMICX vs. HRSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WMICX
Wasatch Micro Cap Fund
18.80%4.84%20.91%22.58%-40.64%4.51%64.84%42.31%1.73%36.17%
HRSMX
Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund
32.91%23.85%35.48%21.52%-27.99%23.19%60.80%24.13%-6.91%20.60%

Correlation

The correlation between WMICX and HRSMX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2003

0.90

The correlation between WMICX and HRSMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMICX vs. HRSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMICX
WMICX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
WMICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMICX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
WMICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMICX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

HRSMX
HRSMX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HRSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HRSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMICX vs. HRSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Micro Cap Fund (WMICX) and Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund (HRSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WMICXHRSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.37

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

5.34

-3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.32

21.01

-13.69

WMICX vs. HRSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMICX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the HRSMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMICX and HRSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WMICX vs. HRSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMICX drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, roughly equal to the maximum HRSMX drawdown of -64.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMICX and HRSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMICXHRSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.21%

-64.92%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.32%

-12.29%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.44%

-33.04%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.70%

-38.49%

-10.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.96%

-40.74%

-10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.45%

-3.61%

-2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.32%

-13.03%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

3.12%

+0.98%

Volatility

WMICX vs. HRSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wasatch Micro Cap Fund (WMICX) is 6.17%, while Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund (HRSMX) has a volatility of 7.81%. This indicates that WMICX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMICXHRSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.17%

7.81%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.70%

22.04%

-7.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.91%

27.82%

-7.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.60%

27.53%

-2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.38%

26.03%

-1.65%

WMICX vs. HRSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMICX has a 1.63% expense ratio, which is higher than HRSMX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMICX vs. HRSMX - Dividend Comparison

WMICX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HRSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HRSMX
Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund
3.18%4.23%3.75%0.00%0.00%19.96%6.28%0.00%4.59%6.74%0.00%5.73%
WMICX
Wasatch Micro Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%30.82%5.68%11.40%29.75%15.30%9.30%16.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


WMICX and HRSMX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRSMX has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to WMICX (6.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMICX dropped -65.21% vs HRSMX's -64.92%.

HRSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMICX and HRSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer