WMICX vs. FCPGX

In the year-to-date period, WMICX achieves a -8.83% return, which is significantly lower than FCPGX's -6.27% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WMICX having a 10.75% annualized return and FCPGX not far behind at 10.40%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WMICX has a 1.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FCPGX's 1.00% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Micro Cap Fund (WMICX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WMICX Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is comparable to the FCPGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMICX and FCPGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

WMICX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%.

The maximum WMICX drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, which is greater than FCPGX's maximum drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMICX and FCPGX.

Wasatch Micro Cap Fund (WMICX) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) at 5.80%. This indicates that WMICX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.